after dinner sneeze

a lot of g says, t says

Archive for the ‘Restaurant Reviews’ Category

FTC dominates Monsu

leave a comment »

t says:  The Finer Things Club (an idea we knowingly ripped from The Office) held our monthly meeting at Monsu (we had been on hiatus for a few months because I was being a party-pooper and working all the time).  In attendance at April’s meeting were kp, a, v, g, k, cm and me.  After g and I had a delightful brunch there, we rolled up into Monsu for a late Friday dinner with the gang.  This is what went down …

4/2011, Friday 9:30pm, Party of 7.  The moment we walked in, we saw that the people sitting at the large table were about to get up to leave.  It’s a good thing.  Had they not, then surely we would have fought them … West Side Story style (or not).  So, unlike our experience at the sister restaurant Modo Mio (where we waited an hour before our reservation), we were immediately off to a good start.

We ordered a mess of food.  And as we ate, we proceeded pull out a mess of wine, ranging from whites to bubbles to reds (including a very classy $12 magnum of Protocolo).  g and I had the lamb “in the style of the horse”, the osso bucco, and the carbamare pasta.  I found the lamb to be pretty good – but I actually can’t remember anything particularly mind-blowing with it – I guess I must have missed the big deal about the “style of the horse”.  In short, I think it was cooked well and tasted fine, but I wouldn’t go back to order it again.  I found the osso bucco to be a step up from the lamb, putting a variety of flavors together with a very tender pork – I also love the sesame candy topping and the thick glaze – I might order it again, but only if I was sharing it with other people (i.e. it wasn’t so good that I’d want to hog it all to myself).  But it was the carbamare (i.e. carbonara) that was the highlight – it was beautifully cooked, a great combo of flavors (and that’s not just the prosciutto talking) and everyone who tasted it seemed to enjoy it; it’s a good challenger against Melagrano’s carbonara.  But enough about us – here’s what the gang thought (and I’ll throw in my edits in [brackets]):

lamb "in the style of the horse" ... whatever that means.

a says:  Overall, it was a great experience with great people [yea, we are pretty great …]. The space is better here than at Modo Mio but I think the food nod goes to Modo.  The special gnocchi was outstanding, better than the “regular,” along with the mushrooms on several plates. The pulpo was good but did not bring all elements of the dish together perfectly. The osso buco, again, was good but did not blow me away. The roasted fennel with beets was surprisingly complex and tasty for a side. I’d like to go back and try some of the other dishes as well as brunch.

The osso bucco was a mound of tender meat and veggies with an ?apricot?-sweetened glaze and sesame candy on top.

k says:  The evening started off with an amuse bouche of a mini-toast with some kind of lentil spread. An amuse bouche always puts me in a good mood. It makes the meal feel special and feels like a great freebie, even though the cost is no doubt incorporated into the rest of the menu. Unlike others in the group, I like the [regular] gnocchi dish better than the “special gnocchi”. cm and I shared the ricotta gnocchi with crab meat in a sweet tomato cream sauce [this “regular” gnocchi dish is also served at brunch at pictured on our brunch post]. Wow. t will remind me that I liked it so much I was somewhat less than generous is sharing tastes with the rest of the group. Sorry, guys. I also loved our fish dish. It had tender and flaky mahi mahi cooked in a tagine with sausage, a rich savory sauce with mushrooms on top of a bed of israeli couscous. cm said the sausage were great. Our appetizer featured perfectly cooked scallops (cm’s all time favorite) bursting with flavor.  The place was very homey. There was lots of pleasant chit-chat with the wait staff. They didn’t seem at all annoyed by our increasing drunkenness and the absurd questions we posed them (what are those two pigs in the photo doing to each other? and what spice is laying tantilizingly on top of their pig bodies?) All in all, a very successful night of food and debauchery.

kp says: Re: Bruschetta.  The earthiness of the mushrooms paired well with the escargot, which had a nice soft texture and was not over cooked to rubbery proportions.  The bread itself a little on the soggier side but this probably owes to the ‘tagine’-esque pot it was served in which probably steamed the toasted bread a bit. The sauce itself was wonderful a lovely salty reduction of red wine with a hint of garlic and tarragon.  The sauce paired well with the mushrooms and escargot.

Re: Duck.  The confit of leg was nicely seasoned and went well with the broccoli rabe. The leg itself may have been a tad on the drier side, but still delicious.There was a nice smokiness to the leg meat which blended well with the rich sauce.

Re: Scallops.  The scallops were buttery deliciousness. The foccacci had a nice crisp crust and salty taste. The olive oil/ricotta mixture is creamy but could use some nice sea salt coating.

v says:  I prefer the space and ambience at Monsu, but the food at Modo Mio. Though, I was really hungry after waiting for an hour at Modo Mio!

t says:  Wow – it looks like there were some highs and some middles – not a whole lot of lows, which is good.  I think that the best part of the night was a combination of the table we were at (it fit the 7 of us comfortably) and the “chill” (but very attentive) service.  I don’t know how many places can pull off a table like us, but we’re happy they did.  Now if only they were open a little later – we could have used about a half-hour more to linger over our wine (they were closing up at 12:15 or so … Modo Mio let us stay ’til 1:30).

Can’t wait for our next meeting!

Written by afterdinnersneeze

22 April 2011 at 8:02pm

Aimee Brings Some Thunder: A Review of Talula’s Garden

leave a comment »

t says:  Ah yes, it’s now time to put up our Talula’s Garden experience.  We’d done Talula’s Table a number of times (the farm table and the chef’s table … twice), but now it was time for Episode 3: Return to Philly (Episodes 1 and 2 were obviously Django and Talula’s Table).  Here we go!

4/2011, Sunday 6:30pm, Party of 2.  We first arrived and were greeted by the friendly hostess.  She did offer us a seat at the “communal table” and wasn’t the least bit dismayed when we said no.  While we normally wouldn’t mind something like a communal table, g and I feared a JG Domestic-esque nightmare (which apparently has been rectified since the last time we went) and instead went for a normal two-topper.  And it’s a good thing we did (more on why later – it has nothing to do with the communal table being bad or anything like that …).

g noted that everyone appeared to be friendly and happy; it was nice to see that while they were most likely stressed out of their mind (it was their first weekend officially open), they were quite pleasant!  As our server greeted us, she let us know as nicely as possible that there was a corkage fee for the wine that we brought (I knew there was – it’s $25, but as soon as you order 3 glasses of wine, you’d spend more than $25 anyways …) and then proceeded to explain the menu and how cheese could be incorporated whenever/wherever you wanted.  It was a neat idea.  Knowing g, she’d probably make a whole meal out of cheese if she could.  But alas – we went a more traditional layout: app, main, cheese, dessert.  So let’s bring it!

veloute of sweet pea with squid

g was very impressed with this dish.  The texture was velvety and lying underneath was what we can only presume was squid ink … and she ate every last drop.  She even ate the squid … she normally avoids tentacle-containing animals, but she couldn’t resist!  But as good as it was, it paled in comparison to mine …

oxtail consomme with marrow dumplings

So here’s the skinny on the oxtail consomme ….  It doesn’t look like much (and it’s not helped by my camera and photography skills that suck).  And that hunk of meat doesn’t look flattering … but it was magnificent – tender and flavorful – not as gamy as oxtail can be, but definitely in-your-face cow.  And then there was the consomme, which was equally flavorful (it was so good that g even snuck her spoon in to taste the broth inbetween my spoonfuls), the perfectly brunoise veggies (at least, I think they were 1/8″ cubes), and those little dumplings which had a nice bite to them with a subtle flavor – mostly getting flavor from the broth around it (so I’m not sure if the marrow added a whole lot – it might have been too subtle for me to really appreciate amidst the rest of the dish).  At first I felt that the crouton was a bit unnecessary – but then I realized that it  allowed me to completely clean the bowl, not letting a single drop escape, so it was indeed useful after all.  So I take the lead, 1-0.

As I had mentioned, g and I opted for a two-topper.  The table we were assigned was seated somewhat near the hostess stand, which is where Aimee was fluttering about, so we were in prime position to try and get her attention (we wanted to say “hi”!).  I tried to convince g that it’d be a good idea if I did my over-eager smile and wave, but she felt that it was too creepy.  So she kept the look-out and eventually caught Aimee’s eye sometime after our appetizer.  She came over to greet us, making us happy and giving us an opportunity to shower her with praise for how great everything looked (and to thank her for moving back to the city) and the successful first course.  She seemed a little nervous, but it was her first official opening weekend, so she seemed a bit excited, too.  It was nice to see her!  As I’ve said in the past, she really has a way to make you genuinely feel like you’re special – which we appreciate – it really makes us want her to do well (which, in retrospect, is perhaps a very good talent to have for someone in the food industry).  So now that we had seen Aimee, it was time for our next course!

double the beef, double the fun.

g went for a manly entree (it seems like she always gets the manly entree) – but she promised to share (I was going to get it, too, but it’d be dumb to get two of the same!).  Those puddles of white were almost like a potato foam, and it was accompanied by a turnip and a carrot, both of which were divine (a divine vegetable?  yep – beautifully cooked texture).  But the real star was that rib (?boneless short rib?) hiding under that thick brown glaze on the left.  It … was … ridiculous.  It’s probably the single best short rib I’ve ever had – including the short rib we had at the Inn at Little Washington.  That’s no easy feat.  g wondered if it could have taken on the Inn’s sous vide filet as well, but I’m not quite sure that this braised piece of meat could have matched the texture/flavor imparted by the sous vide method – it was close, though.

Just some gnocchi and mushrooms, right?

Gnocchi and mushrooms.  No big deal, right?  In fact, you always see gnocchi and mushrooms (I think we’ve had it at Django, Talula’s Table, Osteria – I’m pretty sure I’ve seen it at other Italian places and contemporary American places all over the city).  So what?  Brace yourself.  This, my friends, was no normal gnocchi-and-shrooms.  First off, there were a few different kinds of mushrooms on the plate – so it was a bit of fun trying each.  And yes, these gnocchi were a step up even from the normally exquisitely texture Django/Talula gnocchi in that they were lightly pan-fried/roasted/seared/something, so there was a  slight browning on the outside, giving it a bit of a super-thin-shell.  And there was the round yellow egg yolk that added a wonderfully unctuous sauce-like mouthfeel.  But it didn’t end there – because if it did, it would have only been on par with ever other gnocchi-and-shrooms dish in the city.  No, there was something different – something weird about this dish – and I still just can’t figure it out!  Everything I’ve described to you so far would suggest that this was going to be a rich-and-heavy dish (courtesy of gnocchi and egg yolk).  But no.  There was something else going on.  It had some sweet, but it had some liveliness to it.  Or was it some kind of acid.  Whatever it was, that some kind of something livened up the dish.  It made the gnocchi, mushrooms, and yolk have a lighter, zippier, more playful taste than what I was expecting.  At first I thought it was maybe those little red specs, which at first I thought were paprika, but I couldn’t get any of that smoky paprika flavor on the palate (so now I have no idea what those were, either).  You know – it was probably something so simple that I’m overthinking it (someone’s going to be like, “duh t, it was balsamic vinegar”) (EDIT: raisin puree!!  that’s what it was!), but it was definitely there and made this one of the best gnocchi dishes I’ve ever had (I would have said best, but it’s been a while since we’ve been to my former favorite: Babbo).  Nevertheless, it at least so far beat out Vetri (Vetri’s was a volatile gnocchi – I prefer a denser gnocchi), it beats out the old Django/Talula’s, it beats out Gnocchi and La Viola and Mercato and Melograno and Modo Mio/Monsu …  Maybe I’ll leave it as the best gnocchi dish in the city?  Will that piss off the Italians?  Probably.  *Shrugs* I’ll happily eat my words if they give me a better gnocchi dish.

queso

Obviously, if you dine at Talula’s, you have to get some cheese, too.  We went for the three-cheese “special” – they were described as being in the style of brie/camembert.  They were definitely on the lighter side in terms of flavor – no extremely-vegetal/musty/fungusy flavors here – just butter and creme and a pleasant twinge of ammonia towards the rinds.  Of course, there were more subtle flavors going on up in there (it’s not like they were all the same or anything), but I’m no cheese connoisseur so my feeble attempts to describe the differences would be met with laughter and ridicule.  I will say that the Inn at Little Washington gave us a bit more variety (and quantity) than that which we had here – but maybe that was our fault – there were some more elaborate cheese options on the menu which we had not chosen (I think kp would have disliked our cheese choices – he likes them stinky and funky).  For a split second, I was about to regret not being a bit bolder in our selection … and then the unexpected happened.  Aimee showed up with two glasses of cava.  She said, something to the extent of, “and nothing goes better with rich cheeses than cava.”  Aww – how sweet!  A simple gesture like a splash of free cava really put the dot in the exclamation point of the meal.  And you know what – g found that the cava was indeed a perfect accompaniment, and it really pushed these cheeses show off more of their subtle flavors.  Personally, I can’t drink more than a single sip of bubbles, so g also helped me with my glass, too (much to her chagrin I’m sure … rriigghhtt).  Meanwhile, I stayed with my red wine and enjoyed the cheeses and the substance that was in that jar all the way to the right, which was filled with what can only be described as liquid crack.  Ok – some people might call it “rhubarb compote” … I call it liquid crack.  It was delicious.  And it was versatile.  It paired nicely with each of the cheeses (although that’s not too hard to see – it’s not like the cheeses were assertive personalities) and it even worked well with our dessert:

Looks weird, right?

Welcome to the real dessert of the evening – I love me a good cheese, but I like to end on sweet.  This was the dark chocolate “cremeaux”, as it was called, which I can only describe as a cross between chocolate mousse and boardwalk fudge (i.e. it maintained the rectangle shape).  It was accompanied by some caramel (with salt I believe) and some chocolate crumbles, and some BACON DUST, and those marshmallows.  Ok, right off the bat … caramel and salt.  Winning!  Then bacon dust … winning again!  But why bacon “dust”?  I believe it was a good way to introduce the flavor in a very restrained manner.  While I would have been happy with bacon bits, this was a more tasteful/playful way to do it – not like an over-the-top-bacon-on-everything (it seemed to be mixed in with the chocolate crumbles the most).  We had seen bacon dust before at Talula’s Table when Bryan was there and were glad to see it back in action.  But wait – and then there was those marshmallows … winning even more!  I don’t know what  they did, but it wasn’t just a plain blow-torched marshmallow – it really tasted like it had been roasted over a campfire (and if it was just a plain blow-torched marshmallow, someone please tell me and I will go out and buy that blow torch, myself).  In summary, what you had was a chocolate-based dessert with a variety of textures (the crumbles, the marshmallow, the fudge-ness, the caramel sauce) and intriguing flavors (bacon, smoke, caramel).  It was a very solid dessert …

Now by this time, g and I had polished off a bottle of red wine.  We have never been able to conquer a full bottle of wine above 12% alcohol (we did a bottle of white … once).  So naturally, we started doing things we wouldn’t normally do with our food.  Like have some cheese with our chocolate.  Or some rhubarb with our chocolate.  Or some rhubarb with our cheese with our chocolate.  And throughout these experiments we came to the conclusion that the triumvirate of that cheese plate with the rhubarb compote with this chocolate essentially turned out to be the best dessert we’ve had in the city (I’m trying to rack my brain to see if we’ve had something better outside the city – and while I can’t think of any, I’d like to remain conservative).  Shazam.  Zahav’s hold over me since whatever desserts I had way back when I had lunch there with k was over.  Of course, a lot of wine had been drunken, so maybe we should go back and re-try this just to make sure we weren’t hallucinating (actually, it’d technically be an “illusion”, not a “hallucination”).

And there you have it.  This was a stunning meal.  It started off with a “very good” veloute and just kept climbing from there, ending with a bang.  Time for some critical analysis …  The food here is definitely not as fussy as the Inn.  Duh.  It was also less than 1/4 the price.  And it wasn’t as rustic as our Philly favorite, Bibou.  The food came off as something inbetween, appearing a bit more polished than Bibou.  As far overall “feel”, the food reminded me a little of what I think JG Domestic is trying to be: a homage to local ingredients, but cooked superbly.  But, as you can see from the pix, the food is presented with a little more of rustic touch versus JG – it’s not like they were stacking veggies into pyramids or making intricate sauce smear designs everywhere.  As far the quality of the food – it was just as delicious as Bibou (which I prefer to JG … Jidoori chicken be damned) and a better cheese/dessert course (keeping in mind that we’ve only tried one dessert and one cheese plate thus far).   I found it interesting that Aimee described Talula’s Garden as “trying to do something that people say ‘only a small retaurant can do’ … but for a bigger restaurant.”  I can see that.  But I also can’t even imagine how hard it must be trying to produce food of this quality as they take on larger and larger parties – I hope the quality won’t go down, because if Talula’s is going to last in this erratic restaurant scene, it’s going to have to rely on the food (surprise!), alone.  At this point, g and I are going to give Aimee the nod over JG – however, I have heard that JG has stepped up its game, so this will probably be a heated battle as the months pass.  I’m not sure who would win in a Talula’s Garden vs. Bibou fight, as Bibou comes in at a lower price point (per dish, and it’s BYO), but it is far more difficult to get to/from (cabs, even when called, don’t exactly come right away to Bibou for pick ups) as well as get in (Bibou reservations have become scarce since the Philly Mag list).  The FTC has a meeting therein June, so we’ll find out!

Drawbacks?  There was a bit of lag-time in the beginning between the bread and the first course and and the first and second courses.  But for the remainder of the meal, everything was smooth.

The only other drawback I have relates to my longing for a more intimate environment.  It’s tough for a space like that Washington Square place to come off as intimate or garden-esque – there’s super-tall ceilings, distinct eating sections, lights, colored walls, etc … but I really have to just get over it – Django is gone, and this is the future – take it or leave it.  And trust me.  I take it.  Plus, it’s not like Aimee could lower the ceilings or cut the dining room in half or anything.  I will say, however, that I’m really excited for the outdoor space.  Hell – I’d put a retractable roof and walls on that outdoor space and make that the restaurant because that’s what I think of when I think of “Talula’s Garden” (aside from the obvious garden-esque theme, it just really feels homey and close – I like that).  Yes, I know that the outdoor space has gotten a lot of criticism with people/bloggers claiming that it looks too much like a Terrain store or something like that – but what’s wrong with that?  It’s pretty.  It’s got character.  It’s got a splash of up-scale (gotta do something with Starr-bucks).  What more do you want?

In conclusion, we wish Aimee’s new venture a ton of success – the food and vision is deserving of it (also, all this time, I have neglected to mention that the chef, Michael Santoro, deserves a lot of praise, too!  Double-duh!).  I must admit some reluctance in giving Mr. Starr any of the real  acclaim (the parts of the business that I [perhaps falsely] attribute to him – the large space, the liquor license – aren’t exactly my highlights, however, if he comes with Aimee, then so be it), he has won these compliments out of me by hooking up with the right people and finding a way to deliver actually good food and not just an over-shnazzified environment (looking at you, Pod).  g believes this to be the best of the Starr restaurants.  I reminded her that Morimoto was a Starr restaurant.  She thought an extra 2 seconds and was like, “yea, so?”  Shazam again.

Written by afterdinnersneeze

18 April 2011 at 11:22pm

Marabella’s Beefy Balls and Bread Pudding

leave a comment »

t says: I was on my home today and decided to pick up lunch.  Not feeling awesome (allergies are kicking my butt right now), I decided to go for something comforting and delicious rather than just heating up whatever was in the fridge.  But what to do, what to do?  All of Center City in front of me – where should I go?  Well, it had to be new [to me], do takeout, and be warm.  And then I happened to walk in front of Marabella Meatball Co – a place I had always wanted to try!  kp tried it a while ago but wasn’t impressed despite the favorable reviews it had garnered.  BUT – he hadn’t tasted the classic beef meatball.  Obviously, this needed to be done … for the sake of the blog!

4/2011, Take-out, Party of Me. So I rolled up in there and ordered myself some beefy balls … and some rabe … and headed home.  I assembled my sandwich, reserving a meatball and some bread for g (I ordered it unassembled).  Here’s what it looked like.

Meatball sandwich with rabe!

Overall, it wasn’t bad!  It definitely had a home-made feel to it – made me feel warm and squishy inside.  The texture was good with some nice spring in the bite without being too hard.  The taste was decidedly beefy – almost too beefy in the sense that you really didn’t get any other flavors.  I wished they either cut it with some pork or added some more herbs or something.  I guess I really shouldn’t expect Marabella to be as complex as Barbuzzo’s or as awesome as g’s … or maybe I should!  Beef meatballs can have flavors beyond just beef!  I will say however that the sauce, is better than Barbuzzo’s, which comes off as tangy/sweet to me; but Marabella’s was still not as good as g’s (I’ve become a gravy snob – gasp!).  The roll was soft which I appreciated immensely (nothing ruins a meatball sandwich more than crappy bread), and it’d be a true champion if they somehow got a crusty outside like Tony Luke’s rolls.  As for the rabe … not bad … not too different from what we can make at home (but we like it more garlicky).

For me, the Marabella star was the bread pudding.  For $1, you get a tiny bit (about the size of two shot glasses) of bread pudding that is the most wonderful dessert you can find for $1. Now I don’t know if maybe I just happened to get a “good” one or what, but that bread pudding had texture and creaminess and just the right amount of sweet and cinnamon.  I might have to pick up a second dose of it next time I’m passing through to confirm that it’s as good as it was today.

Would I go back for lunch?  Sure – it tasted pretty good overall and the people behind the counter were super-nice.  I also kind of like the vibe in there (they have BYO seating in case you want to stay).  I can see my dad and I just grabbing a sandwich and eating it there.  But would I go out of my way to go back for dinner?  Probably not … it’s a good lunch, but not something I’d actively seek out for dinner if I was looking for a “dinner out”.  Sorry Marabella.  But if you came out with a beef-pork meatball, I’d be back to give it another go!

What’d g think?  Well, she came home, and I told  her I couldn’t tell her about the meatball until after she ate it – I didn’t want to bias her opinion.  So she heated it up, ate the sandwich, and reported …

g says: I’d like it more if there was more “stuff” in the meatball, like onions, cheese, parsley.  I’d say it’s one step up from a WaWa meatball sandwich.  It’s good, but I wouldn’t be able to eat a lot of just the meatball, itself.

Written by afterdinnersneeze

6 April 2011 at 2:49pm

Monsu: A Great Brunch Hiding in Sabrina’s Shadow

leave a comment »

t says: Our friends thought of going to brunch this past Sunday.  And for once, I didn’t push going to Cochon … don’t get me wrong, I still love Cochon, but I think I have gone enough times so that I feel confident that I can go a weekend without it and not feel like I was “missing” something.  This also has to do with a recent menu change – they removed the awesome Elvis French Toast and replaced it with PB&J French Toast, which is good, but not quite as off-the-hook as the original.  The pancakes are still delightful, but no longer come doused in fruit, rather, crushed Oreos, which are good, but is definitely a lot of sugar.  And they removed the hanger steak … so g and I have decided to branch out beyond Cochon for brunch (unbelievable, right?!).

So we originally planned to join our friends n, m, and kp at Cafe Estelle (k and cm are too busy traveling in Spain to come!).  As we drove there we laughed at the crowd in front of Sabrina’s – ha!  Silly people!  Cochon is always line-less.  And there was Monsu across the street!  But wait a sec – there was Monsu across the street!  As soon as g said, “we gotta try that place”, n reasoned, “well, Cafe Estelle will probably have a line, too – maybe we should try it out!”  And shazam!  We were being spontaneous!  g is a spontaneity-junky, so she was totally in.  I dropped off g, n, and kp at Monsu and found a parking spot (m was meeting us there – he had very important doctor stuff to do … I suspect someone had a runny nose or something at the hospital and m wanted an excuse to wear his hospital scrubs to brunch …).

April 2011, 11:30am Sunday, Party of 5. There were a lot of savory items on the menu at Monsu – maybe a French toast and like one other dish for sweet.  At first I was nonplussed (O … M … G … I hate that word – just finished reading a memoir by an author who used it no less than 3 times in 200 pages … drb uses it every now and then, but whenever he uses it, I feel like he’s making fun of it, which is acceptable – it’s such a dumb word).  But then I started eyeing these awesome t-esque dishes.  Gnocchi, lasangna with cocoa, scrapple, and a whole lot more.  Suddenly, I was no longer nonplussed – one might say I was plussed.  Here are some shots of what kp and I ordered and shared.

The scrapple's playing hide-and-seek under some veggies!

The scrapple tasted good and had a nice internal consistency – it just needed more of a crust on the outside.  Other than that it’s some mighty-fine meat!  And the veggies had a nice sweet taste to them.  g still refused to eat much more than a bite (but I love her anyway).

No gnocchi left behind!

The gnocchi were also quite good.  Their texture was how I like my gnocchi: soft but with a bit of bite so you still feel like you’re chewing something (I know gnocchi texture is a very personal thing).  The sauce reminded me a lot of a vodka cream sauce.  I wish there was some kind of vegetal zing in there, like a parsley or a basil or something fresh just to cut through the cream.

The split personality lasagna ... hiding under an egg.

So the lasagna I believe deserves a special mention.  It walked the line between savory and sweet, as there was a bit of cocoa and cinnamon (or at least, we think it was cinnamon) that had to play nicely with the cheese/meat/pasta.  The result was a success!  Topped with an egg, it was the perfect breakfast lasagna.  I’m not so sure I’d eat it for dinner (it’s also on the dinner menu), but for brunch this is probably the best savory-sweet balance outside of pancakes-and-bacon that there is.  Superb job Monsu!  Also, the egg on top reminded me a bit of Modo Mio – it was a good idea then, it is still a good idea now.

g had Eggs Basildict, which is a very peculiar name, but she liked it a lot, claiming that perhaps she “won” with the best dish.  I disagree, firmly believing the lasagna was superior, but I will say that hers had a more vibrant complement of flavors – it just wasn’t as unique as a sweet-savory lasagna.  Sorry – no pics to show you g’s dish – she was too far away for my crappy iPhone camera to reach.

All in all, Monsu was a success for brunch.  There were no lines and plenty of open tables.  It completely boggles my mind that across the street at Sabrina’s, people want to wait for a spot.  Simply put, Sabrina’s food is good (don’t get me wrong – if you put their food in front of me, I’ll eat it), but not worth waiting for.  And now that Monsu is right there, I definitely see no reason to wait (unless you desperately want a cup of cream cheese shoved in your French Toast like Sabrina’s likes to do).  I also see a lot of potential for Monsu for dinner – I feel an FTC meeting coming!

What are the drawbacks?  Well, n did have an omelette that I think she regretted – it wasn’t bad, but I think she felt it was a little dull next to some of the other items on the table.  I sampled a taste of m’s mpanada, which was pretty good – I wonder how he liked the dish in its entirety?  I think one of the big drawbacks was, as I had mentioned earlier, that there really weren’t a lot of sweet on their brunch menu, so if you have a sweet tooth (like me), afterwards, you might still find yourself craving something “more”.  Fortunately n and m had the right idea: Isgro’s is right down the street!

Written by afterdinnersneeze

5 April 2011 at 2:28pm

Foster Harris House B&B Raises the Bar

leave a comment »

t says: On our trip to VA (which we made primarily to visit the Inn at Little Washington), g and I stayed at the Foster Harris House Bed and Breakfast.  It was this cute little place run by a husband-wife team (and their son and dog) right down the street from the Inn.  While one could have walked from the Inn to the B&B, there was very little even sidewalk, so we actually drove between the two (all 15 seconds).  Had the weather been warmer, we would have walked it … but it ended up being a little chilly.  As a matter of fact, it snowed the last night we were there – this is what we awoke to:

Disregard the screen in our window - the landscape is pretty!

As you can see, the backyard of the B&B looks out onto nearby mountains and fields.  We actually sat and picnicked on those two chairs you see in the foreground the day before it snowed!  It was like we had two seasons – spring and winter!  It was such a beautiful area.

Aside from setting, Foster Harris House has a few other awesome benefits.  g and I jumped on a Living Social deal, so we stayed in the bomb-diggity suite at like 60-70% off (which didn’t necessarily make it “cheap”, rather, “reasonable”).  The place was spotlessly clean (g wasn’t afraid to use the bathrooms/shower/towels/sheets … and she has very high standards!), and furnished to give a warm, homely feeling throughout the room.  We also had a little sitting “nook” which we sat and sipped wine in as it looked out over the landscape (that’s where I took the picture).  As for the bathroom, it was tastefully adorned with marble and 6 shower heads (1 normal, 1 of those hand-held things, and 4 jets from the walls – 2 at shoulder height, 2 at waist height) – it made it very difficult to go back to “normal” showers when we returned home.  And we read that another room has a jacuzzi!!  The room also featured this fake electric “fireplace” that actually did spew heat, keeping us extra warm and cozy when it was snowing outside (it added a nice fire-like ambience – hoky but cute).

Finally, the owners also prided themselves on providing a dynamite breakfast in the mornings.  John would cook these beautiful three-course meals for all the guests each morning at 9:30am.  g normally feels that such forced socialization is stupid, but the food was pretty and tasty and the meal was low-key (and included in the room rate), so she survived (and then I’d get to talk about the other guests later on behind their backs … I’m mean like that – g refuses to partake in such character assassination). The meals consisted of a fruit-granola-yogurt first course with some frickin-delicious Talula’s-Table-esque scones, a protein-centric second course (e.g. eggs, meat, etc), and a small, sweeter carb-centric final course.  I of course enjoyed the final courses on both days the most:

World's tiniest pancakes! ... out of focus!

Some fancy German pancake.

Now, there were other things we did on our trip, so we’ll share with you two of the funniest things we did.  The first was a visit to a very famous winery …

Anybody watch Real Housewives of DC?

So anyone who’s watched the Real Housewives of DC (I actually haven’t, but g has a little) will know of the Oasis Vineyards, run by those people who crashed the White House parties.  As you can see, they weren’t taking visitors that day …

Another one that we had visited was set up by an Indian man/family with a very compelling story – something about how his mom had sacrificed so much for him to study in the US that he opened this winery and dedicated it to her.  He seemed like a very nice man, but unfortunately his wines were not much better than alcoholic fruit juice.  Sorry – I tell it like it is.  But what was funny is that they had tons of merchandising and also served Indian food!

Butter chicken and samosas with wine?

Unfortunately, like the wine, the food was unremarkable.  Sorry kp.  You better travel down to Narmada Winery and set them straight!

Overall, the trip to VA wine country was splendid.  It really was as relaxing as our trip to Napa.  The quality of the food and wine might not have been as high (with the exception of the Inn), but it it costs 90% less to travel there, and some of the sights are just as impressive, so it deserves some props.  I hope we can visit again with some friends.  I don’t know if we could all eat at the Inn or something, but it’d be a lot of fun to pack out an entire B&B and go vineyard-hopping!

P.S.  We also have a cookbook from the Foster Harris House … and they have the recipe for their scones in there.  It’s go-time!

Written by afterdinnersneeze

3 April 2011 at 2:24pm

GTC goes corkage (boo!) but makes a fine veggie sandwich (yay!)

leave a comment »

t says: I wandered into GTC today to buy a sandwich.  Wanting something lighter than my normal food choices, I opted for their veggie sandwich (the “jardiniere”).  While I was there, I eavesdropped and found out that (and maybe it’s old news to everyone else) that Garces Trading Co. is now going to charge $10 corkage for bottles of wine after the first one.  Bummer man!  Sorry a!

AND, the lady behind the register told me that they are going to move the sandwich-making into the kitchen, move the bakery area to where the sandwiches are, and then put in a full bar where the current bakery is!  Looks like things’ll be changing at GTC, and I’m not sure if it’s for the better (at least, for what I like GTC for … everyone else may disagree and like the change).

How was the sandwich?  Awesome!!  It had grilled radicchio and this thinly sliced zucchini and, most importantly, delicious bread (crusty outside, soft inside).  I would venture to say that it’s the best of the sandwiches currently available (ever since they 86’d the lamb sandwich …).  I would have taken a picture of it, but I had to choose between stopping eating it (for the pic) or continue making my mouth happy with grilled leaf chicory (that’s what radicchio is – I just found out) … and guess which one won!

v says: Nooooooo. Bad graces, bad!! Slap! slap!

Written by afterdinnersneeze

31 March 2011 at 11:55am

Invading the Inn at Little Washington

with one comment

t says: As I had mentioned before, I’ve been pretty busy lately.  Actually, since January, things have been downright crazy.  But then everything came to an end this past Friday.  And now I’m back, baby!

So … what did g and I do to celebrate!?  We had constructed a plan to do our own “most important meal of our lives” (after all, it was a belated Christmas, g’s Birthday, and t’s-done-being-crazy celebration!).  In honor of such a momentous occasion, we decided to go big time.  We left town … we went to Virginia.  What the hell is in Virginia?  Why, the Inn at Little Washington of course!!

Now, the Inn is far more bawler than g and I normally do.  It’s suit-and-tie.  It’s super-fancy decor.  It’s an ultra-attentive, ninja-like wait staff.  And it’s fussily-presented food.  But you know what … we deserved it!

So we booked ourselves a room at the Foster Harris House Bed and Breakfast via a Living Social deal (more details about that later) and we braved the silly DC traffic until we finally made it to dinner …

Let’s dive right in …

3/2010, Friday 8:30pm, Party of 2. And here was our first course!

Introducing ... the world's smallest baked potato!

That’s right!  When our canapes hit the table, we feasted our eyes on “the world’s smallest baked potato”.  It was so cute!  I let g have her pick of canapes first (I’m thoughtful like that) so she went for the tiny baked potato (with sour cream, chives, and bacon bits) as well as that green gin-and-tonic bubble.  On one hand, she said that the potato tasted exactly like a potato, so it wasn’t revolutionary, but it was so cute that it wins big points for pizzazz.  The gin-and-tonic bubble was definitely some sort of molecular gastronomy concoction which g seemed to like very much.  I had the one in the foreground which I believe was a braised pork belly which was absolutely divine.  And to be honest, I completely forget what that friend thing was in the back there (g suspects it was a risotto ball?).  So … it was a fun start.  Nothing mind-blowing … yet …

Mint Pea Soup ... and a familiar sight ... gruyere bread thing!

So, then the soup came down.  It was awesome!  Who would have thought that mint goes with peas (not me!).  And that little cheese puff thing was most certainly a gruyere gougere – very similar to that which we’ve encountered at Talula’s Table.  And it was just as good.  g and I wondered if we could eat it fast enough if they’d give us another like at the pop-up.  But we didn’t want to try to pull a fast one here – we were sure that one of the ninjas wait staff would notice.

For our first course, I went with the lamb carpaccio … but I don’t think you’ll be able to appreciate it:

Curse my iPhone!! Or curse the iPhone operator!!

These were some insanely-thinly-sliced pieces of herb crusted lamb and scoops of Caesar salad ice cream.  That’s right – Caesar salad ice cream.  The ice cream was creamy, cheesy, garlicky, and worked well with the lamb.  I really wish you could have seen it.  I mean, it is kind of gimicky, however, the ice cream serves real purposes: flavor and keeping the temperature of the dish nice and cool. g’s first course (not pictured) was a spicy big eye tuna with avocado, mango, crispy shallots, and a sake-yuzu sorbet.  It looked amazing and tasted wonderful.  It reminded me of some of the bright flavors one would find in a well-made ceviche, but far more substantial, with gigantic chunks of tuna and a yummy yuzu.  Her dish was better than mine – darn!  g’s up 1-0.

So on to my second course:

Mac and Cheese

This mac and cheese was ridiculous.  There were like 8 penne noodles with cheese and panko crumbs atop some Virginia ham (can’t see it) and one of those melted cheese touilles.  And yes … truffle.  Now keep in mind that I’m not one of those people who go ga-ga for truffle – but here – it was being used stupendously!  The cheese was top notch with the creamy texture that a mac and cheese should have (I hate it when it’s a dry-crumbly-chunky cheese).  The noodles were the perfect texture.  The truffle was fantastic and the ham was beautiful … and so it should not come as a surprise that what you see before you is the best mac and cheese that I have ever had.  Period.

Lobster and gnocchi combo!

g’s second course was a fricassee of lobster with potato gnocchi, green grapes and curried walnuts.  I’ll leave it to her to fill you in with the details …  She discreetly passed off her mushrooms which I demolished – they were delicious, too!  But I’d say that I won this one (1-1)!

More Lamb!

My entree was another lamb dish.  At first, I was hesitant that getting two lamb dishes would be ridiculous – but the waiter assured me that the two dishes would be different enough so that it’d still be a great meal.  The lamb tenderloin was spectacularly prepared (I ate one before I took the photo).  The salad had some cucumber, tomato, and [presumably fried] garlic and there was a lemon puree (I forget what the green was – mint?).  Overall, the dish was spot-on – technically perfectly cooked lamb, beautiful flavors, but in the end, nothing blew me away – it was a perfectly prepared lamb … but it was overshadowed by …

Beef Two Ways (and there's a hidden third component off to the left)

g chose a beef two ways – one was a filet wrapped in Swiss Chard, and the other was a pecan-crusted short rib.  But which one was better?  Well, I’m a short rib sucker, so any faithful adsz reader would probably guess that I would have gravitated towards the short rib … But you’d be wrong!  The short rib was amazing – with a nice sweet sauce, a wondrous crust, and pecans – it’s neck and neck with the best short ribs I’ve ever had … but that filet … it was other-worldly.  In short, it was the most tender, flavorful piece of beef I’ve ever had.  g won again! (She always chooses the best entree!)  But how did the Inn pull it off?  How could something like filet actually have flavor beyond just “beef”?  Furthermore, this was no normal “tender” fillet – remember, this was the most tender filet (actually, the most tender piece of meat) I’ve encountered.  What was the secret?  Sous vide!  I guessed it when I tasted it, but had it confirmed by the waiter.  It was!  Amazing!  It makes me want to get one of those Sous Vide machines for our home!  I wish I could better recapitulate the exact flavors for you but the descriptors escape me …

Cheese Plate

g went for a cheese plate dessert.  Mere moments after she ordered, we heard a “mooo” noise. It was coming from the cheese guy.  Imagine a formally dressed dude pushing a large fiberglass cow (i.e. their cheese cart) while using a toy moo-maker (I have no idea what those toys are called).  And, to boot, the guy was hilarious.  He was giddy for cheese  and full of cow-centric jokes.  For example …

“Why do cows have bells?”
“Cuz their horns don’t work.”

Ok … it might not sound funny now, but in the setting of the Inn, this was hilarious.

As for the cheese, there’s no way we’d be able to tell you every single cheese, but we can say that all those selected by their expert were fantastic.  g’s favorite cheese was the gouda (apparently pronounced “Howda”).  We even found the blue cheeses to be approachable and delicious – while normally blues are a turn-off for us.

And finally, I went for a more classic dessert:

A Real Man's Dessert ...

It featured a lemon cake, a chocolate souffle, and a frozen raspberry souffle (more like a frozen raspberry mousse than anything else).  They were all very good and executed well, but to be honest, the cheese was superior … g takes the win 3-1!

So, let’s sum it up …

This was an amazing meal.  There were some impressive sights, from the baked potato and the mac and cheese, to impressive, best-I’ve-ever-had dishes (mac and cheese and the filet).  And while some of the other dishes might not have blown my mind (e.g. the chocolate souffle), ever single dish was executed perfectly; g and I, although by no means “experts”, could not identify any technical errors – I’ll leave that to the chefs and real foodies out there.  The only regret I had was that we missed out on the tour of the kitchen!!!  DARNIT!!  Maybe next time …

Written by afterdinnersneeze

29 March 2011 at 12:32pm