Napa in pictures … Day 2
t says: Day 2 started off pretty early in Napa – I popped in Bouchon Bakery for some delicious pastries. Unfortunately, I took no pictures … let’s just say it was awesome. Oh – and also, let’s just say that if you go any later than 7:30am on a Saturday during tourist season, you’re going to wait (fortunately, I got there at 7). After breakfast, g got her nails did (it’s becoming a vacation tradition!). With full bellies and g’s finished nails, we got down to business with our first tasting of the day: Ma(i)sonry.
Maisonry serves a variety of wines to taste in an indoor-outdoor gallery, including a garden with sculptures. It was a wonderful setting in which to drink wine.
g and I elected for a tasting of a crap-ton of high-end cabernets. 5 in a row. Tasting notes include: “an immature teenage punk-rocker with tusseled hair”, “a classy alluring woman at a skinny black dress”, “a sexy vixen with whips and chains”, “raisins gone wild”, “a baby’s bottom”. End result: Kristine Ash’s offering (the vixen) and Tor’s offering (the baby’s bottom) were our favorite, with Tor getting the slight edge for grace.
Ma(i)sonry is a great place to go to taste some phenomenal cabs from a variety of winemakers and vineyards. Yes, it’s pricey, but this was clearly the best “tasting” we had on our trip because it allowed us to compare similarly-pedigreed/priced cabs head-to-head, with no bias or pressure to buy. Now if only we could afford more of those bottles to bring home with us … maybe next time … Grade: A.
we proceeded to lunch at TK’s ad hoc …
the best fried chicken i’ve ever had … seriously … the crust could not be any more perfect! Even the cornbread was wondrously fluffy – however – you feel your arteries clogging with every buttery bite …
ribs and a piece of shoulder … it evoked memories of bbq’s of my childhood but with a length and complexity that i could probably only now recognize. the sauce that was oh-so-addictive – i would use it on every sandwich ever if i had access to it
the potato salad and corn were pretty good – not super-remarkable, but not bad, either …
and here it is: an Ad Hoc cookie … the base recipe for my own cookies … i kinda-gotta-say it: I like mine better – a darker chocolate and a lighter cookie in both flavor and texture – sorry TK!
Our next wine stop was Ehler’s Estate. We don’t have pictures, so you’ll just have to take my word that they do a nice job there, with a few solid cabs, of which the 1886 comes out on top (predictable, as it’s their top bottling). Personally, I feel that their more interesting offerings were the non-cabs (Petite Verdot and Cab Franc), but maybe that’s just me being picky (or maybe I still had Kristine Ashe on my mind …). Grade: B+ (A fun place to visit, but I’m not sure we’d go again on our next trip).
By this time, g wanted a pre-dinner nap, so while she slumbered, I ventured into Napa for another wine-tasting:
Bounty Hunter Wines. This. Place. Is. Awesome. For real! It’s part wine bar and part wine shop (and part bbq joint). They have an impressive selection of wines by the glass (and by the “taste”) including a few bottlings unique to Bounty Hunter, and the food looked darn tasty (not fancy – just plain ‘ol tasty). The had a very nice pinot from Brittan vineyards that I’m currently trying to figure out how I can get more into PA. We’re definitely going to revisit this place on our next trip – I wanna go back with g! Grade: A+.
Napa Vintner’s Collective. This little tasting room is most similar to the Carlton Winemaker’s Studio that we visited in Oregon. The shtick is that it serves as a tasting room for a lot of very tiny vineyards/winemakers throughout the valley. It had a pretty reasonable tasting fee ($25), but they don’t allow you to pick every wine you want to try – it’s all subject to whatever they have open at the time. Grade: A-.
For dinner, we went to Bouchon …
Bouchon has a bustling bistro feel, with some very attractive entrees on the menu (think homely French – not quite as rustic as Bibou, but not fancy-shmancy, either). As you can seen above the meal started off nicely …
… but then the lights went out! At first it was very romantic. g made an astute observation, “this is kind of like our version of camping!” Yep – she’s right-on. In any case, the restaurant ultimately had to close down, cutting our meal short. At this point we had had our appetizers (I had an octopus appetizer that was actually quite rubbery – g’s salad was ok), and were kinda-sorta forced to eat our entree in the dark (after the lights went out, we were served our mains in the dark without being asked whether or not we’d like to continue dining). I have to say that I was a bit nonplussed about this experience and contemplated asking the manager if we could abandon our entrees (or at least mine – the gnocchi dish was actually not a great dish to eat in the dark), but he appeared very busy/preoocupied with all that was happening. We sucked it up, paid the full bill (they made no offers to comp anything and I was too irritated to raise a fuss), and walked out. Sorry Bouchon – two sad courses out of four and a disregard for patron’s dining experience … you get a D- (the good bread helps you evade an F) <g interrupts: Holy crap! You gave Bouchon a D-? I think that’s a little harsh!> back to t: Ok, then maybe a D … but the point is that it’s so not worth a Michelin Star or the tariff we paid. I did attempt to contact the restaurant to talk about the experience, but no response yet …
Fortunately, I had some Kara’s Cupcakes to put a smile on my face back the hotel room. Thank goodness for Kara.
after dinner sneeze 
Leave a Reply