after dinner sneeze

a lot of g says, t says

Archive for the ‘in Philadelphia’ Category

Marigold Kitchen hangs with the big boys

leave a comment »

t says:  a got in on a free Savored.com reservation a while ago and was gracious enough to suggest that it be our January FTC meeting.  And where would we be going to kick off the new year?  As we pondered the list of 30%-off restaurants , we spotted one place where we absolutely had to go: Marigold Kitchen.  a and v had been for restaurant week the past fall and loved it.  g, kp, and I had never been.  It was go-time!

Since making the reservation in 2011, there were a few [free!] times that the dinner needed to be rescheduled, increasing our anticipation (or maybe it was just my anticipation).  At one point, a and I got talking about the wine for the dinner.  I suggested that we add some element of a blind wine tasting.  It was eventually decided that a would choose a bottle, I would choose a bottle, and the rest of the table would have no idea.  It was going to be a show-down and we were pretty sure that it was going to be fun!

In preparation for dinner, I decanted the wine and sent teaser pictures to a.  I’m mean like that.

poor corksmanship on my part

my mystery bottle decanting ... (I have no idea why I poured it into my half-bottle decanter)

I poured the wine [with a funnel] back into the original bottle and g and I headed off to the restaurant.  Taxis conspired against kp, but g waved her magic taxi-finding wand and we saved the day by picking up kp and arriving at the restaurant only 10 minutes late.  Fortunately, v and a were there and situated.

As we settled in, a explained to the server what was going on regarding the wine.  The server guy seemed a little lost; I crossed my fingers and hoped for the best.  In case he mixed up the decanters, I had already tasted my wine beforehand (it was the first time I had ever had it) so I was pretty sure I could pick it out if I needed to.

The menu looked delicious – I found at least three apps and three mains that I wanted to try.  It was almost painful trying to narrow the options – the blind double red wine tasting that was to come helped me out.  Little did I know that what I was choosing was only half of the dinner experience.  Actually – it was more like 1/3 of the dinner experience.  One-third of the dinner experience was the wine.  And the last 1/3 was the food that just comes out of the kitchen – it was amuse bouche galore!  We were sent no less than 7 amuse bouches for the meal.  While we wrote down all of the amuses, I think I can say with complete confidence than the “best” ones were probably the simplest:

it's not cappuccino ... it's butternut squash bisque with thyme foam!

Yea – it looks extremely boring, but the taste was so vivid.  It tasted even more like butternut squash than actual butternut squash (e.g. like when you eat Capo Giro gelatos and they’re “mango” is even better than actual mangos!).  And I know that foam is super-frilly (e.g. maybe they could have just added thyme to the soup), but I believe that there really was something special about having such a powerful flavor in a light foam.  Maybe it’s because it’s very pleasant to have a little thyme foam mustache to lick off your lips and accent the butternut squash flavors lingering after your last gulp.  Whatever it is, kp is going to steal this simple flavor combination for future soups – all he needs is one of those foam canister thingees.  Done deal.

Another awesome amuse was our first amuse: the mango lassi (not pictured).  v preferred the chestnut ravioli with fennel salt.  Everyone had their preferences among the amuses, but the butternut squash  cappuccino was on everyone’s list.

My vote for “most interesting” amuse was the foie-stuffed grape:

looks like a few grapes, right? WRONG. There's foie in there!

When the waiter came around with this little spoon that looked like a sprig of grapes (one for the each of us), we were perplexed.  Foie?  In grapes?  And how’d he get it to look so natural?  As I ate my grape, my mouth was so confused.  The exterior skin was totally grape.  And then the foie’s texture was kind of like a softer, over-ripe grape, so that was still expected.  And then the unmistakeable butteriness and flavor of foie crept in.  Confusion!!  And then v swore there was some kind of chocolate taste going on her mouth and I could’t help but agree (but as far as I know, no chocolate was in it).  So weird.  I wanted to do it again!  But alas – we had none left.

breakfast-style foie

Another impressive dish was the foie appetizer: “breakfast style foie”.  It had a slice of foie torchon with cinnamon foam what I think was a blueberry compote.  The other side had a nice slice deeply seared.  If I closed my eyes and smelled the dish, I swear it was like French toast made from blueberry muffins and a side of some kind of breakfast meat (?breakfast sausage?).  And it kind of tasted like that … but 10x better.  As I’ve said before – I’m not a huge fan of foie by itself as it’s a very powerfully gamy flavor and a pretty mushy texture – but when chefs find a way to mix the foie with other flavors, I’m a happy guy.  This foie presentation totally hangs with the likes of Fond and Bibou.  It’s fussy, yes (more foam!), but how can you complain if it tastes this good?

The main courses were pretty solid (three of us got venison, two of us got rabbit), but I think compared to all of the amuses and appetizers that we had had beforehand, none of us were really blown away.  I did the venison dish, which featured a small-but-thick slab of venison accompanied by a venison scrapple.  Both preparations were “very very good”, as it was technically executed quite well, but all of the whimsy and creativity of flavors and cooking in the amuses were absent, so it came up shy of “excellent”.

a says:  I agree with t on all counts. The mango lassi and soup were the most flavorful and interesting dishes of the night. My marinated boquerones were a pleasant surprise in that I don’t normally love anchovies but found these fresh, light, and well-paired to the apple salad. My experience with the venison was much like t’s – a nice preparation but I thought the scrapple had more going on. (v interjects: The helping of scrapple was outstanding. I ate scrapple twice in the same day, once at Cochon – they have an updated menu for brunch which is excellent – and once at Marigold. Both were great, but I preferred Cochon’s.)  My profiterole and mint ice cream dessert was imaginative and whimsical but lacked something, in the end.  [It was] one of the most enjoyable meals from start to finish that I’ve had in Philly. However, none of the dishes had the depth of flavor – that ‘wow’ factor – of say a Bibou pig’s foot or the fish soup at Han.

t says:  Oh yea!  My dessert was the chocolate-chocolate-chocolate one – it was chocolate in all kinds of forms and textures.  The whimsy was back, which I appreciated, but the depth of chocolate wasn’t all there.  They backed away from a deeper/darker chocolate and went for a sweeter, milkier chocolate that, while fine, didn’t really hold up to the red wines that were on the table.

In conclusion, I will say that I believe that the amuses prop up the meal to something really special. I mean, it was probably a 3.5 hour meal and at no point was anyone bored.  At one point, with a glisten in my eye, I remarked that I felt like some of the tastes reminded me of Bryan Sikora’s cooking – back in the old days of Talula’s Table (and Django) … back when he’d surprise you by making something that looked unfamiliar taste familiar, or something that looked familiar taste completely new … back when his food kept me on my toes and kept me thinking … Oh those were the days …

I only wish that some of that fun would find its way into the mains.  Regardless, I believe that Marigold, like Cochon, is one of those under-the-radar Philly restaurants that are making wonderful food and pushing boundaries, even if no one is giving them any credit.  Better make reservations and go there while you still can …

But wait!  There’s more!  We forgot about something!  What could it be … ?

the wine! we forgot about the wine!

It’s been a pretty long post, so we’re going to have to save the wine showdown for the next one.  It’s coming, I promise.

Written by afterdinnersneeze

12 February 2012 at 1:17am

not just “chicken” at Rotisseur

leave a comment »

t says:  Lately, I’ve been going to Rotisseur in Center City a lot.  I mean a lot.  g actually makes fun of me a little for how often I go, but that’s probably because her dad’s a known chicken-o-phile and could probably eat it twice a day forever if allowed.  He once had chicken for dessert.  He’s serious about chicken …  So … back to Rortisseur.  This place is incredibly close to where we live, so when I’m looking for a quick lunch during the weekday, that’s where I go.  And really – I just don’t think you can go wrong there.  The chicken is seasoned very well and is super tender/moist/juicy.  The kale chips and cornbread are delicious.  Personally, I’m not a huge fan of their mac-n-cheese, but it seems like a lot of other people like it because I see people ordering it constantly.

As good as these are, I have to say that the true shining stars of Rotisseur are those chicken sandwiches.  I’ve seen Chicken Bahn Mi, Chick Italiano, and BBQ chicken.  I’ve tasted the first two on several occasions.  They are absolutely delicious.  Juicy chicken chunks, nice condiments, and, most notable of all, absolutely perfect bread (crisp outside, soft inside, and not soggy … unless you wait too long).

chicken italiano = chicken + broccoli rabe + pepper + sharp provolone

It’s hard to make a chicken sandwich sexy-looking, but what it lacks in visual pizazz, it makes up for in taste.  It reminded me a little of Tony Luke’s Pork Italiano sandwich (which I also love) except that because this is chicken, I am able to convince myself it’s healthier.  It’s gotta be healthier, right?

The downside of Rotisseur, and the thing that makes me cringe 50% of the times I go,  is that they have no good “system” in place to execute food in an efficient manner.  At times when they’re not busy, things run smoothly, as one person preps the chicken and the other does the sides and rings you up.  However, if you walk in at 12:30pm or at 6pm, when groups of people show up hungry for chicken, you’re screwed.  It’s during these crowds that the three people behind the counter try their best to deal with multiple orders simultaneously, but the end result is a disorganized, chaotic, hell-on-earth cluster-fluff.  Once, because I happened to walk in right as a group of 6 people were placing their order, I was left hanging out at least 15 mins before my order was taken and 10 mins to receive my food (and would have had to wait even longer had I wanted mac-n-cheese because they ran out).  I know they’re trying to do right by their food by carving chicken to order and making their sides in small batches, however, they completely fall apart during the lunch and dinner rushes.  Hell, even the tried-and-true “take a number” system’s gotta work better than the off-the-cuff multi-tasking they’re doing now.  Also – they seriously need to scale up their most popular sides – it’s not like they have a ton of room for patrons to stand and wait for roasting veggies for a grab-n-go lunch.  Of course, what do I know?  I have no restaurant experience and am nothing more than a consumer who wants food as fast as possible.  Patience is a virtue I need to work on … and efficiency is a necessity they need to work on … but hot-damn those sandwiches are so good that they keep me coming back for more!

Written by afterdinnersneeze

3 February 2012 at 11:18pm

Lightning Round: Il Pittore, Pub and Kitchen

leave a comment »

t says:  g and I need to get up to speed on some restaurants that we visited in December but didn’t quite get around to blogging about – so here we go:

Il PittoreDec 2011, Dinner, Party of 2.  We went to Il Pittore after I took a fairly important exam (medical licensing exam).  It had been a long day and I wanted me some good-old-fashioned-pasta.  Normally we go to Melograno for such things, but we had an OpenTable gift certificate burning a hole in our wallet, so we figured that it’d be good to use it for something we’d never have done before (i.e. go to a Starr restaurant instead of a BYO).  Props:  The service was superb.  The food was very un-Starr-like (i.e. it tasted like someone was trying to turn out some good food for the sake of the food, itself, not just to conform to a restaurant’s theme).  The ricotta was quite delicious, reminding us of a lighter/springier version of Barbuzzo’s.  When coupled with the foccacia from the free bread basket (i.e. which was jaw-droppingly good on its own), you were left with a stunning combination.

ricotta + apple + thyme

The Paccheri tasted like what you imagine the ocean would smell like in a fantasy Disney world (clean, fresh, delicious seafood).

paccheri = clams + rock shrimp + salami pieces + broccoli rabe

The Corzetti was a unique mix of goat, mint, and chili oil – it was like Han Dynasty meets minty goat meets al dente pasta, with a pretty delightful result.  In retrospect, none of the food was “bad” – as a matter of fact – it was all at least “good” … but I’m going to be picky now …  Slops:  The portions are a bit small overall.  The pappardelle with wild boar is unfortunately not as good as Melograno’s which has a far deeper flavor and more strands of meat.  In retrospect, the pasta dishes as a whole were not as “deep” or developed as those we’ve had at Melograno’s, which usually tastes as if more was “going on” in the pot beforehand.  The EtOH is pricey, matching the “dressier” feel of the place vs. Noble that had been there before.  Conclusion:  Thus, it makes it hard to go to Il Pittore knowing that Melograno is so nearby … but what Il Pittore may be good for is for “classier” evenings when you want pasta on white table cloths without tons of ambient noise … like when parents are in town.

Pub and KitchenDec 2011, Lunch, Party of 2.  a and I went on a lunch adventure together.  We invited the girls, but they were too “busy”, claiming that “someone needs to work to make money” or some such nonsense.  Props:  Nice fun ambience – the worn wood look.  Food was “good”.  Slops:  Food was only “good”.  Allow me to illustrate:

pulled pork sandwich +chipotle mayo + cheese + fried pickle + slaw

As you can see in the above blurry picture, I had the pulled pork sandwich.  It tasted fine (like pork and sauce and cheese).  But it wasn’t as nearly as good as Village Whiskey.  And that makes me frown.  I hoped the slaw could punch it up, but it was insipid.  The fried pickle was the best thing on the plate.

a’s was a bit happier with his pot pie and his Brussels sprouts, but still, it’s not like they rocked his socks:

dude ... my camera skills SUCK

Conclusion:  The meal wasn’t bad, but maybe, just maybe, there’s a glimmer of hope that their dinner will step it up.  I’d give their dinner a try …

Written by afterdinnersneeze

20 January 2012 at 10:28pm

replacing the Saturday brunch spot

leave a comment »

t says:  A little bit ago, I described the disappointing brunch at Supper that g and I had, which resulted in a demotion from its former title on our Gold Standards list as our pick for Saturday brunch..  While we will eventually find our way back there to re-evaluate their offerings (how do you argue with free parking at Whole Foods?), we needed to find a reliable replacement for Saturday brunch.  We looked far and wide and found two potential contenders.

The first is Monsu.  These guys are seriously kicking some brunch ass – and I’m pretty sure no one’s noticing, as it was dead-quiet both times g and I visited in November.  Regardless, we were pretty darn impressed with the food and the pricepoint.  I’ll smoosh together the visits to show you what kinds of things are going on over there.

November 2011,  Saturday Brunch – Multiple Visits.  Monsu features a “tourista” menu in which one gets three courses for $22 (actually, it was $20 the first time, $22 the second time – no idea what the real price is).  In our visits, we’ve tasted a variety of dishes and all are quite good.  Here are our two favorites:

polpo

So it doesn’t look like much … but let me tell you that it was a radical kick to the mouth.  Aside from Koo Zee Doo’s milk-poached polpo at dinner, this is the best octopus I’ve ever had.  I mean, it beat out Amada’s polpo for crying out loud!  I’ve only had it once, so maybe I should re-try it just to make sure it wasn’t a fluke before making such statements …  The octopus, itself, is nicely cooked, being tender and not rubbery, but what really makes the dish is the “everything else”.  Now, there was a lot going on and at the time, I didn’t scrutinize the menu enough to memorize the ingredients, but there was some fennel, some sundried tomato, and something with a bit of kick.  It was zingy and light and sweet and spicy all at the same time.  No, it doesn’t look pretty (it looks kind of ugly, actually), but it was awesome!

steak and eggs

Similarly, the steak and eggs doesn’t look like much.  The skirt steak was medium-rare-to-medium, and the potatoes looked bored next to the eggs, which had an odd paleness to them.  I was pretty unimpressed when this plate showed up in front of me … but then I took a bite: it blew me away.  I’m not sure if it was because I was hungry or if it was because it looked so “bleh” that I had zero expectations, but I was shocked.  There was a wonderfully textured and nicely seasoned steak, perfect potatoes, and eggs that were clearly cooked in some kind of meat-fat drippings.  g felt her steak was over-salted.  Mine was not.  I consumed the entirety of my dish (the portion you see above is the tourista-sized portion – if you ordered it alone, it would have been larger).  So approach this dish with closed eyes, and you’re good-to-go.

Yes, there were starches and desserts offered at our visits, including a delicious pork belly and scallop dish and some classic tiramisu.  I think lc joined us for one of the meals and left quite content.  And, of course, one of the best things is looking out the window at those people waiting to get into Sabrina’s.  Ha!  When will they learn?

EDIT:  I found more photos!

chocolate mousse, profiteroles

?scallop + porkbelly?

something g liked involving poached eggs, basil, toasted bread, roasted potatoes

And now allow me to introduce the next contender: Parc.  PARC?!?  Yea, that’s right, Parc.  Now, I must admit that there are a lot of things we dislike about Parc.  It is a Starr restaurant, so you pay big moneys for EtOH and it’s a little pricey overall (e.g. they charge a ridiculous amount for their “pastry basket” at brunch).  Additionally, because of its Rittenhouse location, it tends to attract a slightly older, posher clientele that’s just not quite our crowd.  And then there’s the food that I’ve bad-mouthed in the past, including a boring burger and boring French Toast.  Don’t get me wrong – they’re still boring and we’re probably never going to order them again – but we’ve been recently going back to Parc again and again (and will do so in the future) for two specific dishes …

January 2011, Saturday Brunch, Party of 2.  g loves the “warm shrimp salad”.  As far as naming conventions are concerned, this is perhaps the most boring name ever.  I think it’s because it sounds a bit like two adjectives and a noun instead of an adjective and two nouns.  Also – it should be noted that this is no mayonnaise-laden shrimp salad – this is a completely different animal, being more like a traditional salad with delicious shrimp and dressing  Furthermore, even I, who generally hates salads, have been known to enjoy the dish every now and then.  Fresh greens, avocado, shrimp, truffle [oil], and buerre blanc sauce.  It just can’t go wrong.  It’s neck and neck with Tria’s “grilled asparagus salad” as our favorite Philly salad (and might win just by virtue of being closer to us than Tria).

The second dish is one that I encountered just recently:

pancakes!

That’s right – it’s just a pancake.  No bananas foster sauce, no bacon ice cream, no chocolate anywhere on the plate.  This is a new, more mature t in town – let’s call him “fuddy-duddy-t” (can anyone guess precisely what I’m referring to when I say “fuddy duddy”?).

fuddy-duddy-t says:  Sometimes you just want a pancake.  And that’s it.  You want it a little sweet and a little buttery.  You want it to be rich like a bisquick pancake, but still light and fluffy.  You want it to be thick, but perfectly browned on the outside and still cooked the whole way through.  You want it to remind you a simpler time when you were 7-8-9 years old and would eat McDonald’s Hotcakes with your grandparents before heading to the mall to play video games … except you don’t actually want to eat McDonald’s Hotcakes because their texture is that of a sink sponge that’s on it’s fourth week of use …  This is that pancake.  Lightly dusted with confectioner’s sugar and served with plain maple syrup, it is an homage to all that is good and holy about pancakes.

Written by afterdinnersneeze

11 January 2012 at 5:03pm

Meritage’s Korean taco mediocrity

leave a comment »

t says:  Over a disappointing $5 glass of zweigelt at the wine-room-formerly-known-as-Biba (it must have been a “special” for a reason: it sucked), cm lifted my spirits with news that Meritage was bringing back their Korean tacos for a single dinner – that very night!  Whoa!  g and I were psyched.  We’ve loved Meritage’s Korean tacos from their first release over a year ago.  Unfortunately, we just were too busy to drop by and enjoy some this past summer.  This was a second chance!  Woohoo!  We paid the bill at Biba and weathered the winds whipping across the Schuylkill as we crossed the bridge.

November 2011, Wednesday Dinner, Party of 3.  We reached our destination without incident and sat down in a surprisingly empty restaurant (we were the only diners).  This made me a little sad – I had always secretly hoped that Meritage was doing swimmingly despite not garnering any recent foobooz or PhillyMag love, and this was not a reassuring sign.  Then we didn’t find our favorite server.  Darn – that guy, whatever his name is, is so awesome.

While we did sample a few dishes while we were there, I think the whole point of this post revolves around these:

korean tacos!

They had some vegetarian Korean tacos and some shortrib ones.  I ordered two shortrib ones and looked forward to the happiness that would almost certainly ensue.  I was served these two tacos, and, with a smile creeping across my face, wrapped one up for the first bite.  I went for it.  I chewed and chewed.  But something was wrong.  It had the same ingredients as before: tortilla, sauce, kimchi, shortrib, shredded veggies … what was wrong?  The ratio of shredded veggies to shortrib was off, with a substantial amount of shredded greens filling up the taco.  The meat, itself, wasn’t as tender as I remember and, weirdly, it didn’t taste as succulent as before – it was drier and not booming with Korean flavors (the shortrib didn’t taste anything more than shortrib).  The kimchi and sesame seeds were nice and all, but only a small amount was included.  What happened to my beloved Korean taco?  I don’t know.  It was … mediocre!  Egad!  It wasn’t the stuff that’ll invade my daydreams and make me salivate as I type.  I guess it’ll have to live on in my memories …

The other food was ok – but at this point I have long forgotten what we ate (there may have been a dumpling dish that was delish!) as I was crushed at the tacos had changed.  I feel especially bad for cm as this was his first Meritage Korean taco, and now it’s likely his last.  Maybe Meritage is out of practice?  I really want to give them another chance next year – maybe this time was a fluke?  Regardless, I sincerely hope that their Korean Fried Chicken hasn’t changed, as that might actually bring a tear to my eye.

Written by afterdinnersneeze

9 December 2011 at 7:36pm

Korean hoagie face-off

leave a comment »

t says:  There was a week in time where I found it convenient to eat at a lot of Philly food trucks.  Perhaps I am not as well-trucked as a, but I nevertheless found some pretty interesting handheld foods that are worth mentioning.

As I was walking by Koja’s truck (it’s got some pretty bright colors), I was distracted by their advertisement of a “America’s Top 10 New Sandwich”.  Check it:

KoJa promoting its bulgogi sandwich

I couldn’t let the opportunity pass, so I ordered one and consumed it as I walked:

Koja bugogi steak sandwich = steak + onions + peppers + cheese + bread

This sandwich was interesting because it’s kind of like they made an ordinary cheesesteak except that you replace the standard meat with sweet, succulent bulgogi meat.  Sounds like a good idea, right?  I must say that the bread was wonderful on this sandwich – super soft.  The meat was surprisingly tender (bulgogi is commonly overcooked).  What was interesting, though, is that there was still cheese on the sandwich; the Korean flavor + cheese combination took some getting used to.  In the end, I feel that it was a solid sandwich, and a great deal!  (Something like $5, or maybe less than that?)  I’d give it another go if I needed to.

The next thing I needed to do was to find another Korean-inspired hoagie.  I knew just where to go: Tyson Bees.  But there was one problem.  Actually, there were two.  The first was that they discontinued the steamed pork buns – a favorite of mine, even if the quality of the product had gone down substantially since the truck changed owners (it was never as flavorful as it used to be, but still pretty good for $3).  They did, however, have a Korean bulgogi burrito.  I’ve had it before, but this time I asked them to put the filling onto a hoagie roll.  They did, no problem:

Tyson Bee's bulgogi burrito on a hoagie roll = steak + rice + special sauce + kimchi + other stuff + cilantro

As you can see, this is definitely not like KoJa’s.  While KoJa’s paid homage to the classic cheesesteak, this is very different.  There’s meat and some kind of “special sauce”, kimchi, and a mix of veggies and herbs.  Unfortunately, Tyson Bee’s meat was fairly tough – it didn’t have the give that KoJa’s had.  Bummer.  The bread was also not as soft on the inside or as crackly on the outside.  However, the redeeming qualities were the kimchi and cilantro which added a nice zing to the sandwich.  The rice was superfluous, but of course, this was meant to be a burrito, so I can’t ding them for that. I can ding them for expense, though, as I think it costs more – something like $7-$8.

Conclusion: When push comes to shove, I’m actually going to give KoJa the nod for the bulgogi burrito – I just couldn’t wrap my head around Tyson Bee’s inferior beef.  That said, maybe I should suggest that KoJa should just toss some kimchi in their sandwiches – maybe at the last second.  Or maybe allow patrons to choose kimchi vs. cheese?  I mean, they’ve got to have kimchi because they’re a Korean food truck, right?

Written by afterdinnersneeze

3 December 2011 at 4:21pm

supper’s brunch disappoints [despite a big dog]

leave a comment »

t says:  adsz likes Supper’s brunch, having recommended it in the past as a great place to go for Saturday brunch, as our perennial brunch favorite (i.e. Cochon) is closed on Saturdays.  Having a hankering for some red velvet waffles, we went again.  Here’s how it went down.

November 2011, Sunday Brunch, Party of 2.  g and I strolled in and confirmed our opentable reservation (another 100 pts!  yes!).  We were seated within 60 seconds and had our heads in menus in another 5.  Exxxxxcellent.  The menu had some new sweet breakfast items that I had to choose between: Pumpkin Pie French Toast and Gingerbread Pancakes.  Feeling in the mood for some pumpkin pie in breakfast form, I opted for the French Toast:

pumpkin pie french toast = pie crust + spiced sour cream + chunks-o-pumpkin

The dish came out and I was ecstatic.  It looks awesome, right?  Sure did!  Unfortunately, something about it just didn’t deliver.  The spiced cream was very subtle – mostly because my brain kept wanting it to taste like pumpkin, but it didn’t (that’s probably my brain’s fault).  The pumpkin, itself, didn’t really have much oomph to it, either, adding more of a textural element than any real “pumpkin”.  And the pie crust was just that: pie crust.  Actually, the crust crumbles were a little on the anemic side – more like the pie crust on the bottom of a piece of Pumpkin pie and not that fluted edges that get brown and tasty.  So basically, I was left with the French toast as the main harbinger of flavor (with maple syrup, of course).  Normally, that’d be ok, as I’m a sucker for egg-dipped bread.  In this situation, however, the bread, while browned to perfection, suffered from the same fate that Distrito’s French toast had in the past: too heavy/oily/fatty.  It’s the kind of thing that you bite into and immediately react, “whoa, that’s rich” … which is surprising because it’s not a piece of PORK BELLY or chocolate cake – it’s French toast!  It’s most certainly a side effect of the cooking process and likely intentional – some will love it and some will hate it.  After the first bite, I kind of hated it.  To illustrate just how overwhelming this sensation was, I only finished one of the slabs, and the other one I opted to not take home (and I normally take everything home).  Yea, that’s some serious aversion.  So in the end, what I had was some exceedingly unctuous French toast but not a a single thing to take the edge off of the richness (n.b. the toast, itself, didn’t really bring much to the table – it was more like a vehicle for fried-ness).  Damn.

g went for the chilaquiles navidad, fondly remembering the chilaquiles from San Francisco’s Ferry Building Market.  Supper’s rendition was a bit more, shall we say, “refined”.

chilaquiles navidad = eggs + tortilla + red salsa + green salsa + chorizo

I want to say first and foremost that these were not bad, as g did get around to eating the entirety of her plate.  That said, these did not quite live up to her memories and were certainly not worth the $14.  The problem list is long.  The chorizo was cold (i.e. cooler than room temperature), which is a big error.  Neither of the salsas were as cooked down or as deep as she was expecting – but they weren’t fresh and zingy, either.  g takes the mic:  It’s like they put together some Mexican ingredients, but it didn’t really have that punchy flavor that they had in San Francisco.  t yanks the cord to steal the mic back:  My question – why serve the cilantro with stems?  I mean, maybe I’m just a sissy, but I don’t like trying to chew stems.  That’s the second time they’ve done this, so maybe it’s their style: no sissies allowed.

g and I also shared that Supper Dog.  We loved their Supper Burger, so we figured the Supper Dog would be a smashing success as well.

supper dog = PORK SHOULDER dog + BACON + bbq onions + sauerkraut + bun + fried pickles

I have to confess that this dish looks a little ridiculous.  It’s clear that it’s composition is for wow-factor moreso than practicality.  Seeing no way that I’d be able to distribute the bread to the unclad parts of dog, I was forced to attack this thing with a fork and knife.  As far as taste goes, g was particularly surprised with how “hot doggy” the hot dog tasted, and I guess I was as well.  It’s like you’d imagine it would taste like straight-up PORK, but there’s no mistaking that the inspiration was indeed “hot dog”.  sr would have been proud.  But that’s where the similarities end, because no hot dog tastes this good (it had a meatier, sweeter taste to it).  Couple the dog with those bbq onions and I was in heaven.  The sauerkraut and BACON, on the other hand, were a bit superfluous, as I would have easily traded in either/both for more of those onions for my dog.  I’m normally not one to turn down BACON, but, as usual when bacon wraps things, the side touching the bacon (i.e. not exposed to heat) wasn’t texturally pleasing, coming across very chewy/slimy/unappetizing.  The sour and delicately fried pickles were a great way to reset the palate, while the aioli really didn’t do anything for me, so I skipped it.   The bread, let’s face it, was unnecessarily fussy; give me a softer bun that actually promotes the use of my hands instead of a fork and knife and I would have written a title of, “Supper’s Super Dog Saves Brunch!”.  So I guess what I’m trying to say is that the dish was a little “too much”; “over-accessorized” is what g would say – but there’s something here for sure.

In conclusion, I’m a little disappointed in this brunch, overall.  Actually, maybe I’m more than a “little disappointed” – I am going to have to remove Supper as our Saturday choice for brunch.  Sorry guys.  On one hand, I feel bad about it because the proprietors seem like such nice, hard-working people.  Then again, I’ve also heard that they claim to have “started” the farm-to-table concept in Philly.  While I’m not Philly-food-historian, I think that may be a bit untrue.  While I don’t know exactly who “started it”, I’m pretty sure that White Dog Cafe has at least been doing it longer, having had its roots from even before Fork opened its doors.  Be that as it may, we’ll be back around to Supper eventually to give its brunch another go.  In the meantime, stay tuned for the brunch spot that will take Supper’s spot on our “gold standards” list.

Written by afterdinnersneeze

29 November 2011 at 3:46pm