after dinner sneeze

a lot of g says, t says

Archive for April 2010

The Truth … about Hellmann’s “Real-ness”

leave a comment »

t says: I decided to start up a new category of posts dealing with the fabled question: “why?”.  Not every one will deal with food, and I’m not even sure if there will ever be another post.  I guess the truth about “The Truth” is that I just couldn’t figure out in which of the existing categories this particular post belongs …

It all started when I was watching television and saw a Miracle Whip advertisement in which they mocked Hellmann’s campaign of being “real” (i.e. they called it “real boring” or something like that).  Not having seen Hellmann’s ads, I had no idea what they were talking about.  Later, I finally saw a Hellmann’s ad that professed that their mayonnaise was “real” as it was made with good stuff like eggs, oil, and vinegar … but did anyone else see the fine white print at the bottom of the screen?  You can watch it here.  It said something like “Contains a small amount of EDTA to protect quality”.  I then remembered that one of my bosses mentioned how EDTA was added to mayonnaise … wanna know why?

We humans love calcium.  Our bones use it to be nice and strong.  Our muscles, brains, and nerves use it to function properly.  It turns out that mold and other nasty things also love calcium, too!  Without calcium, they either don’t grow or grow very slowly.  What does this have to do with mayonnaise? Those “real” ingredients that Hellmann’s is using contain calcium.  This is good for our health, but it’s also good at making foods go bad, as those nasty things can grow in mayonnaise!  So the fine people at Hellmann’s add EDTA.  EDTA is kind of like a calcium sponge.  The EDTA will suck up the calcium so that fungus can’t use it, thus, things won’t grow in the mayonnaise so quickly.  How else could an egg-based product stay fresh in the fridge for so long?

Do I ding Hellmann’s for claiming to be “real”?  Maybe.  I’d say it’s “real-esque”.  But I think they need to call a spade a spade – which maybe the fine print in the ad is enough.  In the end, it is clear that a not-natural “chemical” is added to the food product … and if you can’t deal with chemicals in your food, you shouldn’t eat Hellmann’s.  But for me, I don’t want to buy mayonnaise every time I want a spoonful for my sandwich hankering – so I’m totally fine with it!  It’s not like I depend on mayonnaise for my daily calcium requirement, anyways.

Written by afterdinnersneeze

27 April 2010 at 9:00am

Talula’s Split Goes More Public

leave a comment »

t says: This had been reported a while ago, but now that it’s in the Inquirer, I feel a little more confident in its truth.  I do want to say that it is kind of weird that this is front page news, but I guess if you consider the impact that Django had on the Philadelphia restaurant scene as well as the foodie-prestige that Talula’s brought to the area, it is somewhat big news.

What do I think?  Well, regarding the article’s focus on the Aimee-Bryan relationship (and comments below the article), I feel that most readers will feel that LaBan is most certainly painting a stunning portrait of Aimee, and a less-than-stunning one of Bryan … but … if Bryan did truly pull a Tiger Woods here, then I’m totally fine with that.  Obviously, there weren’t many details.

As far as the Bryan-cooking relationship is concerned, it’s quite a shame, because when we talked to Bryan in the kitchen in June 2009, we loved his attitude about food and cookery and restaurants.  He even admitted that his days at Django killed him with stress, and that he liked Talula’s food-centric, slower-paced gig.  But now the Inquirer claims he doesn’t want the cooking-for-one-table job, either, because he has to do some schmoozing?  So he doesn’t want to cook a lot because it’s stressful, and he doesn’t want to schmooze because he doesn’t like it, but he does want to be “in the loop” as far as thinking up that prospective new place with Stephen Starr?

Finally, what do I think about the future of Talula’s?  Well – g and I have been to the market and agree that they still have excellent food.  As far as the dinners are concerned, we also have 2010 Labor Day Saturday reservations, and if we can get together the minimum number of people, we are in!  If you want to come with us, let us know!

Written by afterdinnersneeze

26 April 2010 at 12:23pm

Bobby’s Burger Palace: Hype Meets Hamburgers

leave a comment »

t says: Bobby Flay came to town, as k had foreshadowed and the end of our Ladder15 review.  He was opening up a new burger joint.  For $7-8, Bobby’s Burger Palace (BBP) promised some semi-fancy, semi-fast-food burgers that are made-to-order.  What makes them semi-fancy?  k already told you: unique topping combinations – not uber-fancy stuff like at Village Whiskey or Ladder15, just good stuff like avocado, bacon, hot peppers, etc.

g and cm were at work on the day that BBP was to open.  And you know … when g and cm are at work … t and k go and have adventures!  k absolutely had to catch a sight of the man, the myth, the legend … Bobby Flay.  Personally, I just wanted to taste me some good, cheap burgers (Ladder15 totally did me in with their over-the-top meat-and-fat-fest).

So, at 3pm, k and I cut out of work to head to West Philly for the opening.  This was actually k’s second attempt at visiting BBP – she’ll tell you more about that visit, her impressions of this visit, and her one-on-one encounter with Bobby later … after she and cm have had time to visit BBP multiple times (I’m far quicker to pass judgement … does that make me a bad person?) …

3/2010, Friday 3pm, Party of 2. So … I arrived at BBP before k and there’s a line.  A very long line … a very long line that extends out the door by about 20 people.  Fortunately, it was a nice day, so I stood and waited for k to arrive.  As I waited, I found that the line refused to move.  There was a BBP employee at the front of the line, so I imagined she was trying to hold us back so we wouldn’t mob the place?  After all, Bobby was inside (I saw him through the windows, shmoozing with the customers).  It became apparent that I wasn’t allowed to go inside … or at least … not if I waited in this line … When k arrived, I explained to her the situation and that we might not be able to make it during our lunch breaks.  Just then … the BBP employee disappeared, and then the whole line waiting outside shuffled into the restaurant … including us!  k has magical powers of non-verbal persuasion …

As we picked out our burgers, we saw him … Bobby.  And you know what … he’s skinnier in person that I imagined.  No, he’s not scrawny, but he’s not “normal American sized male” – he’s leaner, not super-tall, and has pretty highlights in his hair …  We didn’t get a chance to talk to him before we ordered, but we did talk about what k should say as an icebreaker.

I ordered a pistachio milkshake and the “Philly Burger”, which featured beef, hot peppers, provolone (my choice instead of cheese whiz).  Also, k and I ordered sweet potato fries to share.  We paid and were seated at the long curvy-counter – we kept a lookout for Bobby (but he was standing right behind us the entire time, talking to some older gentlemen in suits and ties).  My burger came first – it looked pretty good!  Not as fancy as pictured here, but for $8, who cares?  I saw a sesame bun, a burger topped with hot peppers and topped with melted cheese.  How’d it taste?  Not bad!  The peppers were actually hot!  No, they weren’t fancy hot peppers or anything, but they were still good.  The provolone could have been sharper (as is the style seen in Philadelphia cheese steaks) to compete with the heat.  The meat was cooked well-done instead of medium-well as I had ordered, but it was still juicy.

The sweet potato fries were very good.  They weren’t too sweet potato-y, which is a common flaw in sweet potato fries – they’re often just too sweet!  These were good.  The milkshake was also tasty but not what I was expecting.  I expected it to hit me in the mouth with pistachio – but it didn’t.  It was a sweet vanilla at first, later followed by a hint of pistachio.  The pistachio wasn’t as vivid as CapoGiro’s gelato, but it’s supposed to be a milkshake to go along with what you’re eating, so that might be excusable – and there really isn’t anything wrong with a pistachio-vanilla combo.  I’d get it again!

Overall, I was happy with the result.  How happy?  Well, if I got these at a real sit-down restaurant, I wouldn’t send it back, but I don’t think I’d come back, either.  However, at a fast-food-esque setting like BBP, I think it’d be a tough call between Chipotle and BBP – BBP might have an edge due to delicious milkshakes and not charging a whole extra $2 for adding guacamole to a  burrito (that’s outrageous!).  Of course, BBP has humungously long lines – so long that when I tried to take g there, we stepped out of line and went to Chipotle instead.  Actually – to be honest – I think BBP’s opening was the best thing to happen to Chipotle in a long time – there were several BBP menus scattered about in Chipotle, evidently from people who couldn’t wait for Bobby.  I will say that if I go back, I wouldn’t order the same thing again …  I’d go for chicken and either the Napa Valley Burger (crunchified) or the Sante Fe Burger, the plain fries, and the Black and White milkshake.  I think it’d be another satisfying meal.  But after that – I dunno – 500-degrees is a little closer to home … and we’ve never been!

Written by afterdinnersneeze

26 April 2010 at 10:14am

Cochon: Brunch Round 2

leave a comment »

t says: g and I loved Cochon’s brunch the first time we went there.  Simply put, I never had a better stack of pancakes – and I’ve had pancakes everywhere!  It brings me great pain to admit that they even bested the pancakes made by our summer-time private chef, g’s grandfather.  Of course, g’s grandfather does have some tricks up his sleeve (e.g. fresh blueberries, dark chocolate M&M’s).  But now the question – is Cochon a one-trick pony, or can it do more?  I guess they can also do “Eggs Cochon”, which g thought were very good – so maybe they’re a two-trick pony?  It took us a while, but we gathered together some of adsz’s cast members and went out for brunch.  Would Cochon live up to the hype [that I/we gave it]?

4/2010, Sunday 11am, Party of 6.  Although we had reservations, it was clear that they were not needed: there was no line of people, only two tables had patrons, and, at first, there was only one hostess/waitress/server.  I’m happy this place is still on the D-L.

We sat down with our chilled bottle of vodka (for the bloody mary mix!) and contemplated our options.  I had the pancakes last time, and while I loved them, I knew that I had to try something new … for the sake of the blog …  I felt somewhat obligated to take on the “other” classic breakfast starch: French toast.  Cochon prepares theirs with a berry syrup and fresh whipped cream.  It seemed like a winner.  I was set.  Perhaps I was too set – as I might have told the waitress that we were ready when we definitely were not …  But the result was funny and fun!  It involved a lot of “come back to me – do me last” among our castmates.  Oops!  Sorry guys!  I couldn’t help it!  I was excited!

When the French toast came to the table, all you could see were ?3?-?4? slices of bread surrounded by a pool of deep purple and hiding under a mound of off-white whipped cream.  In retrospect, I realize now that it definitely wasn’t a dish that you’d look at and go, “wow, that’s pretty”, rather, “wow, that looks delicious”.  And it smelled delicious, too; my nostrils were filled with the scent of berries and maple.  I was happy.  I offered everyone at the table an opportunity to taste my dish – because there wasn’t going to be any left when I was done.  I gave them fair warning, waiting 6-8 seconds, and when no one raised his/her voice, I dove in.  First, let’s talk about the sauce.  That mixed berry syrup was ridiculous.  It seriously was like I had jammed a bunch of berries in my mouth with some maple syrup – but it was smooth – no chunks.  There also was minimal tartness, so I imagine that lots of sugar went into it – but it didn’t taste any sweeter than normal maple syrup.  The whipped cream was decadent, just as it was last time on my pancakes – it made extra creamy Cool Whip look “light”.  The toast, itself, was … good.  It wasn’t fluffy like at Parc, but it wasn’t just plain white bread, either.  It was an inbetween that had a nice crispness on the outside with some give in the middle … but there wasn’t anything remarkable about it.  But, honestly, it could have been plain white toast and the berry syrup would have carried me through the meal until the very last bite.  I now know the ultimate breakfast … Cochon’s berry syrup … on top of Cochon’s pancakes, with the caramelized banans and walnuts … I might ask them if they can do it next time I go …

g had the steak and eggs.  She and I both agree that they were delicious!  The steak with the red wine sauce was phenomenal – I’d say almost as good as Bibou’s hanger steak, and definitely the best steak-and-eggs breakfast we’ve had (meaning I liked it more than the fancy-fancy steak-and-eggs at Tinto).

k says: I liked the atmosphere and the crab – they were generous with the crab.  But it wasn’t much of a frittata, though – it was more of a scramble.

t says: cm and d both ordered Eggs Cochon.  I think they agreed that while the pig and sauce and eggs were all good – the brioche bread left something to be desired.  It sopped up a lot of the grease from the meat and had a dry, crumbly texture.  g remembered that the bread wasn’t her favorite part last time, either, but she must have forgotten about it because the rest was so good.  cm and d still consumed the rest of their dish, so I think they at least were satisified.  I didn’t try any of their food, so I can’t testify!

Finally, d’s friend ordered tomato pie.  It looked and smelled delicious.  Once again – I didn’t taste any, but if she wants to join the cast and lend her comments, we’d be happy to have her!

All-in-all, I think that while I thoroughly enjoyed eating brunch Cochon, both g and I are noting that there are some weaknesses.  The brioche bread seems to be the biggest problem – however, g noted that they do serve English muffin with their steak and eggs, so perhaps a substitution can be requested if you ordered Eggs Cochon (actually, g prefers English muffin to any other type of buttery breakfast bread, anyways).  That said, for the price and ease of getting in (and ease of finding parking in the area on a Sunday morning), Cochon continues to be one of my favorite places to go.  Now all we need to do is try out some of their more lunch-esque items!

LATER …

Cochon has swapped out the brioche in the Eggs Cochon for “pancetta bread“.  Two words: Holy Crap.

Written by afterdinnersneeze

26 April 2010 at 10:05am

Zavino Gets 2 Bells: Laban Lays on Some Zingers!

leave a comment »

t says: Laban reviewed Zavino, ultimately awarding them two bells.  g and I still have yet to go, ever since we tried so desperately to get in when they were giving away free wine before they got their liquor license.  Given some of the criticisms Laban had, I wonder if maybe he wasn’t allowed in during the snowstorm to get free wine, either – if so … payback’s a bitch.  Well, we won’t let Laban influence whether or not we go – but now we just have to find a time when we’d rather go to Zavino than the nearby Tria …

By the way – g reminded me that Tria has never let us down.  Sure, their menu could use some refreshing, but we’ve just never ever had a bad time there!  The funny thing is – we can’t even blame them for the one time that we ordered a cheese that we didn’t like – it’s not their fault we didn’t like it – they did nothing more than cut it up and serve it!  It makes me think that they have one hell of a business model …

Written by afterdinnersneeze

19 April 2010 at 2:52pm

Posted in Happenings

Tagged with

Chifa and Sampan: Battle Pork Banh Mi

leave a comment »

t says: On Saturday, g and I had a hankering for Sampan’s Pork Banh Mi.  By the way, it has come to our attention that although Sampan spells it “Bahn”, it might actually be “Banh” – so we apologize for mis-spelling it and will slowly go back through our old posts to fix it.  Regardless of how it’s spelled, we wanted it again, as we’ve had it twice so far <#1, #2>, and were happy both times (although we liked it better the first time).  Then I remembered that Chifa also has this  sandwich on their menu; we’ve never had it, but it’s Jose Garces – could his be as equally as awesome?  We felt the storm clouds gathering, casting thick shadows on the grassy field upon which an epic battle was to take place … could Iron Chef Garces beat out Challenger Michael Schulson in Battle Pork Banh Mi?  Furthermore, because Chifa’s more known for its Bao buns (steamed buns with pork belly), should that dish also be taken into consideration – perhaps as an exhibition match?  Thus, we devised a pig-centric three-way battle.  Here we go …

Chifa: 4/2010, Saturday 6pm, Party of 2.  We decided to go to Chifa first.  We did this for a couple of reasons.  The first is that clearly Chifa was going to be the challenger with regard to the sandwich, as we knew that we liked Sampan’s already; Chifa deserved the advantage of being eaten while we were the most hungry.  Furthermore, we wanted to end up at Sampan because it was closer to home (thus a shorter distance to walk afterward on a full stomach) and because if we were still hungry, we knew there were plenty of other delightful items on Sampan’s menu (overall, we and our wallets liked dinners at Sampan more than those we had at Chifa).

We were seated promptly (without a reservation) and we apologized in advance to our waitress that we wouldn’t be ordering a lot as we were doing a pork banh mi face-off.  She seemed amused by and was happy to entertain our ridiculosity.  We ended up ordering a spicy margarita, the pork belly bao buns (Chifa’s signature dish), and the pork banh mi (which apparently was added to the menu around January).

The first dish that was brought out was complimentary “bread”.  When it first hit the table, I was highly suspicious.  I didn’t recall them having a bread basket the last times we went.  In the back of my mind, I reasoned that it was obviously the chef’s attempt to fill us up so that by the time we got to Sampan, we’d be too full to eat.  Obviously, I was too smart for him/her.  Well, whatever the reason/delusion, that was some fine bread.  These were the size/shape of the steamed buns, except that they had more of the baked-brown look with the smell of cheese.  They were served with a spreadable brown spicy sauce.  When I bit into it, the first thing I noticed wasn’t a taste, rather, a texture; it reminded me of slightly undercooked Pillsbury dough.  Sounds gross?  Nope.  It brought back childhood memories of home baking experiments – awesome!  The bread was savory and soft and warm and gooey, and when coupled with the spicy sauce, it was a flavorful way to start our meal.  I eventually reasoned that this obviously must not be the chef’s intention to sabotage our perception of Sampan’s food, as to do that, he would have had to given us more than four of these … because if there were more, we would have definitely eaten them all throughout the course of the meal (our other dishes had some sauce “smears” on the plates that we would have also sopped up with the bread).

The bao buns were next.  You know – that Jose Garces is always so slick with presentation.  I just don’t know how you can make pale-looking buns and brown-colored meat look that appetizing on a plate, but he [or whoever is actually in the kitchen constructing it] does it superbly – it looks like it’s ready for a photo shoot.  Of course, I had to re-structure the components so that it could be handled and eaten more easily (a pretty stack isn’t always the easiest-to-eat), but I appreciated the effort to appeal to my eyes.  Like my eyes, my mouth also appreciated the buns immensely.  The very tender pork belly screamed sweet and savory.  The daikon and carrot added some salty sour.  Mix all of those with the texture of the light, fluffy, pillow-y bun and it was even better than the first times we went!  I did notice, however, that the pieces of meat I had weren’t as fatty as pork belly can be – which is good or bad depending on your stance (I kinda like the fat).  In any case, these really make me want to taste Momofuku’s …

The pork banh mi came out last.  Although of a similar size, Garces’s sandwich isn’t wrapped in craft paper like Sampan, rather, is presented naked, cut in half, and accompanied by yet another sauce smear.  The first thing I noticed was that the bread looked particularly delicious – it appeared golden brown, crusty, and not the least bit squished from cutting.  And you know what – that was some good bread, with an awesome outside crust that resembling a Tony Luke’s cheese steak.  As soon as my teeth broke past the bread, I inhaled a breath of vegetable/herb freshness – there was cucumber and carrot with some mint and cilantro.  As my teeth chewed on the pork pieces (the waitress said it was pork shoulder), it released sweet, but was quickly followed by another salty, savory, mushy-textured experience: the pate!  Apparently Jose likes to add pate to the sandwich, which was only so-so in terms of taste (the flavor of the pate is kind of muted versus the rest of the ingredients in the sandwich, so I didn’t want it to dominate).  Furthermore, with later bites, I found that it’d aid the pork in sliding out the back of the sandwich as I chomped on the bread by acting as a lubricant – that was annoying.  Finally, upon swallowing, I noticed a bit of heat.  At first, I thought it was the spicy margarita, but it was not; sliced jalapenos were hidden among the greens.  The heat was nice just so long as you didn’t happen to get an overwhelming piece of chile.  Overall, the sandwich was good – the vegetables were very bold and up front, the bread and sauce were excellent, and the meat was tender.  I deduct points for the pate (just leave it out!) and too little sauce (put it on my sandwich, not a smear on my plate).  Not bad a bad showing …

After concluding these tastings, we paid our bill and walked over to Sampan.  I was no longer “hungry” but “I could eat” …

Sampan: 4/2010, Saturday 7pm, Party of 2.  We were seated promptly at the “bar” the faces the open kitchen.  This time we were further from the salamanders, and closer to the appetizer prep stations.  As we sat, we watched a pork banh mi being made – it looked simple enough – take some bread, slice it, add some sauce, add the meat, add the veggies, add the herbs, sprinkle some ?nuts? on top, wrap it up, and send it out.  As we watched this one being made, we placed our order, and lo and behold, the one we had just watched was delivered to our table!  It was like they were expecting us!  I guess the reality is that they probably always have one ready to go because they have to make it so often …

First things first – how’d it look?  Well, it was wrapped in paper emblazoned with “Sampan” … I kind of like the old school craft paper they had used the very first time we went.  Furthermore, gone was the blue painter’s tape – they were now using masking tape.  Once again – give me the blue painter’s tape!  I don’t like change, damnit!

I opened up the paper and saw our victim.  While it looked similar to Chifa’s, the bread definitely appeared softer – likely because there was some squishing in the wrapping process and the warmth from the meat was softening the bread.  To be honest – I liked the bread at Chifa better because I like a nice hard outer crust – but if you want soft, then Sampan is the way to go.  But when it comes to flavor, there’s a slightly different story …  Sampan’s veggies and herbs and meat didn’t give me clear distinct notes, rather, a single harmonious flavor, including sour and sweet from the pickled vegetables, light heat from the sauce, a zing from the cilantro, and savory from the pork.  Yes, all the flavor components were the same as in Chifa, but they all worked together at once – there weren’t phases of evolving flavors, rather, one big flavor up front that eventually gave way to the individual components later on, after you swallowed.  It was so good.

After some thought, g and I felt that it was definitely better this time than at our last Sampan visit (and almost as good as our first).  Why?  Well, as we watched from our seat, we realized that the woman making the sandwich with “Fernandez” embroidered on her coat did an excellent job ensuring the right veggie:herb:meat:sauce ratio; this time was near perfect (maybe a little less sauce as our sandwich was a little drippy towards the end), but last time there just wasn’t enough meat.  Thank you Chef Fernandez!  You the woman!

We concluded our meal at Sampan with dessert – the chocolate banana “tart” in which a chocolate crust filled with bananas that were bruleed.  It was an excellent idea, but there were some flaws in execution.  The torch definitely burnt some of the exposed crust, so after the first accidental taste of burnt-bitterness (it’s hard to see the burnt parts as the chocolate crust was a dark brown), we had to seek out and remove the burnt areas.  Also, there could have been some other sauce or ganache or something to bring together the mushy bananas (they were mushy in a good way!) and the firm, somewhat dry, crust.  The waitress did recommend the ice cream to go with this dessert when we ordered, but we ignored her, and now we wished we hadn’t.  Like each time we’ve been to Sampan, the desserts are theoretically great, but taste only “good” – int his case, it wasn’t quite good enough to order again (but they keep rotating the dessert menu, so I’m sure I’ll find something new to order next time).

Conclusions:  Ok – super long post – let’s summarize …

1)  I prefer Sampan’s pork banh mi to Chifa’s primarily because of the bold, harmonious flavor that hit you from the very beginning.  While Chifa did have superior bread and more of a “freshness”, the pate subtracted from the dish, and perhaps adding more sauce and allowing the ingredients a chance to meld together (perhaps wrapped in some kraft paper with blue painters’ tape?) would help it?

2)  Chifa’s pork buns, however, are superior to Chifa’s banh mi – the way the flavors are integrated makes this dish hit you with flavor the same way Sampan’s bhan mi hits you – you get a nice strong, combined flavor up front that eventually gives way to subtler flavors later.

3)  Sampan’s banh mi vs. Chifa’s buns … gee … that’s really close …  I think it’d have to come down to what kind of mood you’re in … do you want bread or buns?  Ceviche (Chifa) or Brussels sprouts (Sampan)?  Personally, I think that Sampan might have the edge because the rest of the menu (or at least, the things we like to eat) are priced more aggressively.  We only wish they could execute the desserts a little better – there’s untapped potential there …

Epilogue:  As we got up to leave Sampan, g tried to direct my attention to the kitchen.  Eventually, she succeeded in doing so (I’m not too good with picking up on her non-verbal signals, and she didn’t want to say aloud, “Hey – look at the guy with the fish.”)  I looked over just in time to see Chef Forneas (the real person in charge at Sampan) pull out this huge fillet of fish (looked like yellowtail) and do some trimming.  He was showing another one of the kitchen staff how to cut the fish [I think].  Then, he attempted to slice off a piece, but was disappointed and left, hurriedly, to the back of the kitchen.  I was psyched because I thought he was going to get a sharp, Japanese knife (one of those single-beveled ones known as a yanagi) and show this fish a thing or two.  This was going to be so cool to see him do some sashimi slicing right in front of us (I’m a little obsessed with kitchen knives)!  After a few seconds, he then came back into sight … with one hand holding the same knife he was holding before … and the other holding a honing rod …  He then proceeded to hone his knife, Gordon Ramsey style, as he walked towards us (and the fish).  I counted the offenses …  He was going to slice this beautiful fillet not with a yanagi.  He was going to use a knife that he was clearly abusing with a honing rod (any knife that you should be using to cut sashimi should not be honed as such).  He appeared satisfied with this solution, as he walked with an air of pride in his honing technique.  With those three strikes, I had no choice but to leave in utter disgust.  Condoning such practices is abominable.  I fought back the urge to reach across the bar, snatch the fillet, and run out the door in an attempt to rescue the meat.  I vow to you here that I will order sashimi from Sampan nevermore

Written by afterdinnersneeze

19 April 2010 at 7:32am

Continental (Old City): Service with a Snooze

leave a comment »

t says: g and I went to Continental yesterday with d and a friend after enduring 7 innings in the rain watching the Phillies. We were wet, we wanted to stay warm, and we wanted to eat near d’s place. The first establishment we visited (Race Street Cafe) was packed – everyone was watching the end of the Phillies game. Been there, done that. We decided to keep moving – so it was suggested we go to Continental. I was definitely a little under-dressed for the place, but I relied on d’s friend’s blazer-with-rolled-up-sleeves and shirt-with-French-words to make up for my ripped sweatshirt and flip-flops. We were successful in gaining entry (no wait!), and, after getting carded, we were seated at a booth …

4/2010, Friday 11pm, Party of 4. The hostess took us to our table and presented us with menus. After a quick scan, I found that even Continental was jumping aboard the Korean taco craze – after Ladder15, I was excited. Then, the waitress came over and, with a blank stare to some point in the horizon, she asked, “Welcome to Continental, have you eaten here before?” She looked very … tired … She explained that they serve food family style and probably said some other things too – I was too distracted by how enervated she sounded. It must have been a rough night.

As we looked at our menus, we decided on the calamari salad, Korean tacos (my choice), and chicken skewers. It must have taken us a while to decide because we were asked if we were ready at least twice before the time we were actually ready … well, either that or she desperately wanted us to get a move on.

The calamari salad was pretty good! Even better than I was expecting. I suppose it’s better described as an “Asian” calamari salad. No, there weren’t any visible sesame seeds or mandarin oranges or those crunch slender things, but there was some definitely soy, ginger, and sesame flavors going on in there – very nice for a pile of lettuce, some cabbage and some calamari. Also the calamari came out crisp and not mushy, so kudos to them! It was a nice sized portion for four of us to share.

The Korean tacos were next. To be honest, g and I don’t really know why they were “Korean”. Obviously, the tortilla wasn’t Korean – tasting distinctly like … a tortilla. The meat was not pork belly or short rib or rib eye … it was pulled pork flavored with a sauce that didn’t really have any resemblance to anything Korean (more like a sweet bbq sauce). There was some pickled cucumber and onion flecks involved, too … but they weren’t Korean either. Don’t get me wrong – it was pretty good (d seemed to enjoy it a lot) – but let’s be real – it’s a pulled pork taco. I’ll have to bring it up at our next Korean meeting.

The chicken skewers came out with peanut sauce. They were fine – nothing that I wouldn’t see at any old catered event that had chicken skewers with peanut sauce. I guess I really don’t have much to say beyond that.

Now, throughout the meal, the waitress did try her best to speed us along. She cleared plates as soon as they were done. She offered to take our salad, but I told her we were still picking at it (which we were – there was still at least 1/8 of the salad left!). And under no circumstance did she show the least bit of enthusiasm. I completely understand if you’re not thrilled with your job, but you kind of get paid to appear thrilled with your job … right?

In any case, I think Continental had a fairly reasonable showing. I’m not sure I’d head back by myself, but if some friends wanted to go, I wouldn’t try desperately to suggest other places. We chose some cheap items from the menu – totaling $32 for the four of us (although it’s not like we were starving to begin with). Aside from the improper use of the adjective “Korean” and the ridiculously uninterested waitress, I’d say: not too shabby, Mr. Starr.

g says: I think I like the one in Center City better. It definitely has better service, better atmosphere, and even better food. Also, I still want to go to center city and sit in a swing chair!

t says: Now who’s being the bad cop?

Written by afterdinnersneeze

17 April 2010 at 3:44pm

Posted in Happenings