I Clobbered the Peach Cobbler Pancakes
t says: I went back for those peach-cobbler-ified pancakes I mentioned at the end of our last Cochon post. Holy crap. It’s basically peach cobbler on top of insanely fluffy pancakes. If you can’t handle your sugar, don’t eat this dish. I was going to take a picture, but I lost control of the muscles in my arms, forearms, and hands, as they were possessed with the singular goal of shoveling peaches, pecans, crumble, ice cream, and pancake into my mouth. I may have blacked out from the time I started eating to the time I finished. Now, don’t get me wrong … personally, I’m more of a banana man, so if I had to choose only one breakfast dish to eat so much of that it’d cause my stomach to actually rupture, the French toast pictured in the last Cochon post would win out, but damn these pancakes would have put up a gnarly, dirty fight. Now maybe if the pancakes also had a piece of bacon on top … ?
Slate: Not Too Shabby!
t says: dz called me up on Friday out of the blue and asked if g and I were free for dinner; we needed to catch up. Unfortunately, g was heading out for a girls’ night at k’s (which I can only imagine included girly-drinks, Dirty Dancing, pillow-fights, truth-or-dare, and lingerie), but I was available! I told dz to pick a place, as it really didn’t matter to me. So let me tell you about dz’s two very important rules when choosing a place to eat:
1) No waiting. Either the place needs to do reservations or be able to take walk-ins without a fuss.
2) Walkability. He has to be able to walk to it in a reasonable amount of time.
But the truth is that I think that he has other rules, too:
3) No pretentious crap that costs a lot of money for a microscopic amount of food (seriously, I have never seen someone “dominate” an entire large vegetable lo mein on their own in one sitting like dz).
4) No required sharing.
5) More than one vegetarian option.
6) Teva sandals must be permissible attire.
Now, none of these are outrageous requirements. If nothing else, they illustrate dz’s priorities when it comes to eating food … He wants to show up at his convenience, order the food he wants to eat, and eat that food. dz doesn’t mess around. But where’s the fun? I suspect that the real enjoyment for him when he goes out to eat is not so much the food, rather, the company with which he eats (as apparently, without company, he is known to completely forget to eat). I was honored to be part of the company!
So, dz chose to go to Slate. I was totally down. It would be great to try someplace new! Well, it’s kind of new. Slate is one of those places that I frequently walk by but have only ever seen two customers inside at any one time. Having been there for a surprisingly good brunch once with drb and g quite a while back (that’s right – three customers at once! sorry, no past review because I forgot what I ate), I knew that they were capable of making good food, but it was hard to convince myself to go to dinner there with so many other nearby faves. This was my chance …
8/2010, 8:15pm, Party of 3. dz, his super-cool girlfriend, and I gathered at Slate for a Friday night dinner. At first, we got the, “it’ll be a while because we have no tables” excuse. This was peculiar because from where I was standing, there were plenty of open tables. Maybe some reservations were about to come in. In any case, when dz’s girlfriend suggested sitting outside, the host was happy to point us to the table and told us settings would be out momentarily. It was a great night for outdoor dining.
Initially, I was torn between the hanger steak and the duck. On one hand, it had been a while since I had eaten steak. On the other, would it stack up to my memories of the delicious steaks I’ve had at Bibou and Cochon? I felt that if not, I’d regret not getting the duck. And so it was decided. Go for the duck. But this wasn’t just “duck”. It was duck with a hoisin-Guiness sauce. I couldn’t imagine what it would taste like.
dz’s girlfriend and I also opted for an order of the vegetable lasagna eggrolls. That’s right. Two oxymorons in a row. Vegetable-lasagna (i.e. no meat). Lasagna eggrolls. Oh, and there was a dose of irony, as it included some “house slaw” as well, which I imagine was supposed to be like what the inside of an eggroll is traditionally filled with. How clever …
Enter our waitress. Now, before I go on, I want to stress she seemed like a nice, well-meaning person, which was great. But man. She was a space cadet. When she talked to you, it just didn’t seem like she was quite all there – maybe 85% there, but the last 15% was daydreaming about something. She took our drink orders (one beer, two wines) but the wine took quite a while to make it to the table, which was a little weird. We eventually found out that although she remembered that I had ordered wine, she couldn’t quite recall which one I had requested. Later, after we ordered the food (while my drink still hadn’t arrived), she then confessed to forgetting my entree as well. She said: “There must be something about you – I just can’t remember what you order.” It must have been my jedi mind trick that I’ve been perfecting over the past two decades. I’m glad I finally have some positive results; g has been completely resistant to all mind tricks, jedi or not – it’s been frustrating.
I do want to say that these small mishaps really didn’t make me angry or irritated or anything – it was just quite funny. dz’s girlfriend did point out that perhaps if she had written down our orders, all of this might have been averted. But where would we find such things like a paper and pen? We’re living in 2010! Get this girl an iPad or something! Personally, my favorite waitress moment was when she came to check up on us after we had been served our food. We said everything was great, and she immediately said, “sweet!” and turned around to walk away. Not only that, she said it in some kind of “voice”. This was not like a normal speaking voice that one would use to say “that’s cool” or “great”. It would be like if you’re hanging out with a bunch of your friends and someone offered you a free brownie. “Sweet!” Actually, it was a cross between Cartman from South Park and j. In any case … it was weird. But then I remembered the perfect place for her: Snackbar.
How was the food? The eggrolls were actually pretty good. Definitely unusual, but good! My brain was confused because my fingers were suggesting eggroll as I picked it up, but my mouth vehemently disagreed. They were beautifully crispy on the outside with vegetables and cheese (presumably mozzarella) on the inside, with a smidge of pasta. And the tomato dipping sauce (i.e. similar to marinara) wasn’t half bad. It was like a super-crispy vegetable lasagna, which I think most people can appreciate. The weird thing was the side of slaw. It was unnecessary. If you’re going to give us some “house slaw”, you’re going to have to give it some kind of visaul appeal. And actually, I don’t even remember what it tasted like. Now I wonder if I even tasted it. Darn. Can’t remember. Someone jedi mind tricked me.
The duck was cooked well. And that Guiness-hoisin sauce had some very nice sweetness and bitterness to it – that was a good combo. But really, I don’t have much else to say because the dish, from the meat to the sides, was well-executed and tasted exactly how it sounds. Not bad! Not blow-your-mind or to-die-for, but not bad! I think that this would be one of those things where if I replicated it at home, I’d be super-thrilled (and then post the recipe on the blog). At a restaurant, I’d be happy the first time I ordered it (which I was), but I’d move on to something new the second time (but at least this ensured that I would have no problem going a second time, which is more than I can say for others … looking at you Bistro St. Tropez).
So – Slate? Food was solid. Wine selection was ample (although not a lot of light-bodied reds – a lot of fuller-bodied, fruit-forward ones) and not super-expensive. Service was entertaining. In short, I’d go back. I wouldn’t lose sleep in anticipation of going again, but I’m nevertheless happy to know that some reasonable food is right around the corner.
P.S. Speaking of losing sleep about food … yes – our Talula’s Table reservation is right around the corner! g’s super-pumped. I am, too. We have a 10-person group (meaning #11 and #12 are still open – you want in, drb?), including a, the super-wine-enthusiast, and we hope it’ll be awesome!
C19 Groupon … Boo!
t says: Cichetteria 19 is another restaurant we’ve been wanting to try. Then we saw this groupon of $25 worth of food for $10. And only one thought came to mind … What a RIP-OFF!! Confused you, right? After all, a few days ago we were gushing over a similar deal for James! Why? Well, you see, C19 is also on restaurant.com for a very similar deal, already! $10 for $25! But, the magic happens if you wait long enough. Eventually, restaurant.com does an 80% off promotion where they will allow you to spend $2 for a $25 gift certificate to go to C19 with the caveat that you must spend a $35 minimum (right now, the promo isn’t on – the promo code used to be “BIG”). kp snagged one last time (but we haven’t gone with him, yet – we’re bad friends). In any case, we’ll wait for restaurant.com to run another promo rather than jump on this groupon “deal”. Way to try to pull a fast one, C19.
EDIT: The current promo code is “clearance”. Go for it. I would venture to say that C19 offers the best deal out of all of the Philly restaurants listed, as you can get larger quantities than just $25 off (e.g. pay $4 to get $50 off of $100). The funniest one is one from Bleu Martini … that says “excludes alcohol” … as if you’re going to go to Bleu Martini for the food …
Sifting Through Vogue
t says: g enjoys the occasional Vogue magazine (i.e. it’s probably the only magazine that we’re consistently subscribed to). We’ve even seen September Issue in theaters, which got me thinking about just how much goes into a magazine that is seemingly “all advertisements”. It’s a lot! But still, I kind of wish they had one with just articles and no advertisements called “Vogue-for-losers” or something like that, because some of the articles, including the food-related ones, are quite fascinating, and it’d be nice to get to them faster. However, I do have to admit that others are … less-than-fascinating.
In any case, this year’s September issue arrived (for those who don’t know the big deal – this is the issue of the year – often the biggest and has a large impact on the fashion world – I don’t know more than that – I’m kind of ignorant when it comes to these things) and was too big for our mailbox, so our mailman put it on the floor in front of our mailbox. I wonder if he even tried to fit it or if he just looked at it, looked at our mailbox, said, “awww, hell no!”, and dropped it on the floor. It’s ok – the 726-page behemoth was poly-bagged.
g instantly noticed, on the lower right hand corner of the cover (placed suspiciously close to Halle Berry’s “features”), the title “the best restaurant in the world”. So she tried to look for the article. She never did find it. Why? Because the table of contents is 4 pages long … but not 4 consecutive pages … They are four pages scattered throughout the first 250 pages of the issue. And not every page is numbered! Hell – the page crediting the editors is on page 290! When she couldn’t find the table of contents in a timely manner, I commented that such a feature was impractical for finding stuff. g informed me that this was the point. I had a eureka moment as she made me aware that this forces you to flip through more ads and that ad space near the table of contents costs more money. Ohhhhhhhh! It’s like the super bowl half time commercial slots … gotcha. I kind of wish that there was a Doritos ad in Vogue …
Well, this morning I was determined to find that article. I wanted to know the restaurant. Would it be an actual restaurant, or would it be a stupid article saying something like, “the best restaurant in the world is the one you like to eat at”. So I sat down before leaving for work and I flipped from the beginning until I found the relevant table of contents page. Just so you know, the food article is on page 672 if anyone wants to read it. It’s a Steingarten piece (i.e. by the dude who’s the super-critical judge on Iron Chef America) about Noma, which recently beat out two other consistent favorites for the San Pellegrino-sponsored distinction. Now that I finally found the frickin’ article, I can read it [later … when I have more time not wasted by having to search for a single article]. If nothing else, the first picture (think a white, unburnt Freddy Krueger with kitchen knives) is pretty cool.
Lightning Round 2! (+Bonus Pic!)
t says: We had a long time friend (drb) and his awesome girlfriend stop by in Philly a couple times during their recent visit to the area. We used this as an opportunity/excuse to show off some Philly cuisine, taking them to places that we thought were surefire bets for impressive food. Because we’ve been to all of these places before, there’s no real point to individual reviews, so here’s the quick and dirty …
drb keeps his own wordpress blog, so if you desire a non-g/t review of some of these places, check it out here. And no, you’re not allowed to think he’s funnier than we are …
Village Whiskey:
Props: BBQ pork sandwich. Yea – it’s still ridiculously good (but I recognize that bbq is a very personal thing, so maybe some might disagree). My friends enjoyed the fries and veggie burger, but did note that perhaps this place was a bit overpriced (e.g. $8 for a glass of whiskey that could be purchased by the bottle for ~$25). My response: “welcome to Philadelphia”. While his girlfriend admitted to liking the veggie burger a lot, drb noted that it contained a lot of intact beans – he prefers a more homogeneous patty. To each their own. Slops: What is wrong with the service here? They just can’t seem to get it together! This was our second time in a row with crappy service. Although we didn’t get the juvenile attitude that our last server had, it took 40 minutes for two sandwiches to arrive despite the place being only half-occupied. And then they forgot to add the onions I had ordered on my sandwich. Very weird. VW has to have the most inconsistent service of all the Garces joints. drb noted that it seemed to him like it was staffed with a bunch of hipsters … and he hates hipsters (n.b. just to clarify, he is not one of those people who assumes that anyone with a tattoo is a hipster; he has absolutely nothing against people with tattoos … just hipsters).
Capo Giro:
Props: Dark chocolate and candied cherry gelato. Need I say more? Well I’m going to, anyways. drb’s girlfriend, who insisted that she had very high gelato standards (having spent time in Europe) and even admitted that she was quite cautious/hesitant/doubtful before tasting Capo Giro, proclaimed it to be the best gelato she has ever had. Bam! It was so good, we went there a second time with drb and his mom a week later. Slops: If it was just a dollar cheaper, that’d be awesome. However, I’d also be 87 lbs heavier, so maybe not …
Carman’s Country Kitchen:
Props: This place’s food was still off-the-hook. We knew that drb and his girlfriend would enjoy the “atmosphere”. We love how we can call up Carman and claim our table early. Slops: Totally forgot that if you have dietary restrictions or particular tastes (e.g. anti-fruit), this is not the easiest place to find something to eat (it’s summer – fruit’s in everything). If the chairs were just a little smaller, we might be able to smoosh in a little closer when sitting at the tables.
Morimoto:
Props: Best pork belly I’ve ever had (it was that 10-hour pork belly appetizer). Holy crap. Also – they had a “special” Japanese eel nigiri. Best eel I’ve ever had. It was the flavor of eel but the texture of pork belly and a crisp skin. Holy crap. It might have been the best piece of sushi I’ve ever had. Even drb also had a “best ever” moment with his sushi. g enjoyed her red snapper special; it was superior to my main dish in both texture and taste (see Slops). We also had some “burnt honey ice cream” for dessert (it was featured as a component in another dessert item, but we asked for it straight up). The pieces of burnt honey (maybe they took a torch to it and then shoved it in the ice cream maker?) were surprisingly delicious as you encountered each little crunch – we’ve got to try this with j and k’s ice cream maker. Also, our server was super-nice – VW should kidnap this guy and clone him. Slops: Alaskan halibut with black bean sauce was … mediocre good. Had it been $21, then giddyup. But for near $30, definitely not. It made me wish they had the Chilean sea bass with black bean sauce on their menu, as I had heard so many good things about it from w; what a difference the swap in fish made (it was cooked fine, but kind of bland).
Kanella:
Props: Reservations on Saturday mornings is awesome – I’m over waiting in lines (although it was kind of empty in there). Cyprus breakfast was tasty – a savory breakfast for sure with egg, ham, bread, fried cheese, and some sort of vegetable. Overall, we enjoyed how the food was not only “simple”, “rustic”, and “delicious”, but well-executed (drb claimed his eggs were perfect). Additionally, it wasn’t food-coma-inducing, which drb and g appreciated (I don’t mind a good coma every now and then). The baklava was pretty tasty – not as good as Zahav’s, but, then again, it’s like half the price. Slops: A little more bread in the Cyprus breakfast would have been great (I’m a starch man). I agree with the waiter from before – the Cyprus breakfast isn’t to-die-for – as there are probably tons of other things on the menu that are awesomer (we just don’t know which ones to choose because it’s not like we recognize any of the items on the menu).
Cochon:
Props: What do you get when you take French toast and top it with one scoop each of peanut butter, banana, and vanilla-bacon ice creams, banana-caramel sauce, and bacon? Allow me to illustrate:
Yea … it … was … awesome. I ate it all (minus the two bites g snuck in when I was fiddling with the iPhone camera (that’s her hand ready to pounce in the picture). Once again – I normally hate taking pictures in restaurants as it’s super-tacky, but this was one of those things where I knew that you’d need proof of its existence (plus I had to tease sr for having to bail on us for brunch at the last minute). g had the fried oyster sandwich (you see it in the background), which was good as well – but come on – what’s going to compete with the “Elvis French Toast”? Also, we saw the chef/owners of Bibou (the Calmels) enjoying brunch here, too (g has a super-power that allows her to recognize/recall important people in the Philly restaurant scene – I would have preferred a more useful super-power, personally). If they eat here, then you can rest assured that my constant praises of this place’s brunch are legit, and not just the ravings of a lunatic. Interestingly, Bibou’s website claims that they are on vacation … Slops: We can’t go anywhere else for Sunday brunch. Ever. They also peach-cobbler-ified their pancakes, so I have to go back for that, too. Maybe this time, sr and ha will come. I’d invite j, but she’s back to school; it’s ok, she wouldn’t regret missing a dish like this, right?
EDIT: We’ve come back and I’ve experimented with putting these toppings on top of their super-awesome pancakes. Surprisingly it was not as good as the French toast. There’s something about the ice cream on top of their French toast that is awesome. It’s almost like the French toast is the “savory” in this dish, whereas their pancakes are like another sweet.
James Groupon!
t says: There’s a website called groupon.com where they have daily Philadelphia-centric “specials”. For instance, you’ll pay $25 for $50 worth of services or stuff. Today, it’s James. Check it out here. We’ve never been, but g’s been meaning to go for a long time. We just bought one – I hope it’s delicious!
EDIT: All gone!! The day has passed. We nabbed two!
The Truth … about Chocolate Cheerios
t says:
The truth about Chocolate Cheerios: they suck.
There. I went there. I can’t help it. They’re not good. In a world with original cheerios (which has an inexplicable cult following) and sweeter versions include apple cinnamon, multi-grain (delicious! my fave!), and honey nut … why does this taste so bad? To their credit, they don’t taste as bad as Fruity Cheerios. And actually, not everyone thinks they’re bad, as I’ve seen some bloggers showering praise upon these tiny O’s, as they satisfy a chocolate craving while maintaining that they are just as healthy as normal Cheerios (it says so on the box!). Not me. The chocolate’s gross. I’d rather eat grass. I’m sure that lowers cholesterol, too.
BUT, fret not loyal readers. This is not just a bunch of pointless ranting and raving and complaining. I also come bearing a solution … a solution that actually is quite delicious:
That’s right … chocolate milk and cheerios. Shazam. I went there. Again.
Before you put on a “That’s disgusting!” face (I know who you are: g, g’s older sister, my parents, anyone who loves original cheerios), I suggest you try it before knocking it. But don’t think of it as a “this is as healthy as cheerios” thing, because it’s certainly not. Think of it as a healthier version of chocolate milk for breakfast (as you now get all of the vitamins and minerals in the cereal). Oh, and a tip is that the milk must be cold and not watery (“fat free” chocolate milk should be avoided, as should Yoohoo brand and all chocolate “drinks” – but these should be avoided at all times, anyways). By the way – the brand of chocolate milk pictured, by “Byrne Dairy”, is quite a good chocolate milk – and I got it out of a vending machine! I haven’t been able to find it anywhere else, though …
And just so you know that it’s not solely an effect of the milk and independent of the Cheerios (e.g. maybe grass would be good with chocolate milk?), I have tried two other combinations of this milk with cereal. It still worked well for the Multigrain Cheerios (not that they need it), but not so much for the Frosted Flakes, which ended up being an oversweetened, textural nightmare.
v says: a is in the Cult. Only eats Cheerios – even has a cheerios T-shirt…. loves them… we buy them in super duper bulk!
t says: g is also a huge fan of the original, but she was kicked out of the cult. Recently, the Wegmans brand O’s seduced her with their fluffier texture and cheaper price. She professed her newfound love for this “generic” toasted oat cereal and her cult membership was revoked immediately, indefinitely.
Credit: first pic sourced from here.



